THE SPEW ZONE

Recently asked Question:

Would the First Church of Druwayu face legal denial in Australia and be treated as a "parody religion" similar to Pastafarianism?

My Opinion:

While any New Religious Movement (NRM) faces challenges regarding its size and age, the First Church of Druwayu is unlikely to be classified as a parody. Unlike Pastafarianism, which is rooted in the mockery of established faiths, Druwayu is driven by honestly held beliefs and a structured philosophical framework. While it embraces humor as a reflective tool for joy, it lacks the "hostile intent" or "satirical smear" that led to the legal rejection of the FSM.

Hypothetical Legal Analysis

Do you sometimes reflect on deep questions about existence that remain unanswered by conventional explanations?

Many people wonder about the challenges, mysteries, and seeming contradictions in life, such as:

• Why is there suffering and injustice in the world?

• Why are some children born with physical challenges?

• Why do dishonest people prosper while good people suffer?

Regression Fallacy: Ascribing a cause where none exists in situations where natural fluctuations exist, while failing to account for natural fluctuations.

Infinite regress is not a sufficient explanatory mechanism. It does not resolve the problem it is invoked to answer but instead postpones it indefinitely. Each belief or claim is said to be justified by another, which itself requires justification, and so on without end. This structure provides no grounding point—it defers resolution rather than offering one.

Beliefs are not equivalent to facts. 

While beliefs may be informed by facts, they remain interpretations, models, or assumptions. A belief cannot ultimately justify another belief without some form of evidence or shared foundation. Otherwise, the structure risks circularity or infinite regress: “A is true because of B, B is true because of C, and so on without closure.” This is not explanation but deferral.

In cosmological contexts, infinite regress fails to answer origin questions. 

The Origin of the Samhain-Halloween Link: Sir John Rhys and the Fictional “Celtic Cult of the Dead” Hypothesis

Everything you think you know about Halloween vs. what is constantly regurgitated and claimed without factual investigation is complete fiction pawned off as facts. Even the various associated or claimed names are nonsense. So let's get right to it.

Etymology of “Halloween”

Halloween is a Christian vigil observance marking the evening before All Saints’ Day. Its name derives from Middle and Old English terms for “holy evening.”

• Form: Halloween is a contraction of All Hallows’ Even (or All Hallows’ Eve)

SANTA WAS GREEK; CHRISTMAS ISN'T PAGAN

🌟 Etymology:

I am adding this part as some have made comments about the meaning of the word, which is not the point of this article. However, to address it, one commentator stated: Christmas isn’t even Christmas. It’s Christ Mass, and I’m not Catholic.

This is the problem today with so many things and what I combat because though the intention may have been honorable, the comment is incorrect. Christ- is obviously still part of the word. But lets get a bit more precise.

The English term Christmas (“Christ’s mass” or “mass on Christ’s day”) is of fairly recent origin. The term originated from the Middle English Christemasse, which came from the Old English Cristes mæsse.

Opening Statement

I did not expect to enter this debate, but one thing must be made clear: twisting words, redefining terms by association, and misrepresenting arguments are destructive habits. They fuel ignorance, which in turn breeds arrogance. This is especially evident in the abortion debate.

Key Points

• Weak Argument from Opponents

  • Critics of Pro-Life positions often demand: “Where in the Bible does it say abortion?”

Who Ordered the Shutdowns — and Who Issued the Federal Mandates?

A comprehensive, sourced chronology from the first lockdowns to the Biden-era federal vaccine mandates — written so you can rebut simplified partisan claims that “Trump was a dictator” when, in fact, the most sweeping federal employment-based mandates occurred under President Biden and imposed true authoritarian and totalitarian dictatorship.

Because the subject has become overheated I asked several AI:

These were the result of AI systems instructed to leave out "opinions" and arrive at conclusions that are not based not social-political sides. It was informed its about analysis. Not opinion or feelings. Just simple math.

AI systems used include Grok, ChatGPT, Copilot, Google Gemini, Claude, Meta AI, and Perplexity AI. They were given the same instructions and to provide the most reliable, consistent and comparative results and instructed to address one another if biases were creeping in and to remove…

Aion, Trinity, and the Engineered Compression of Theology

The concept of the Trinity has its roots in what was known as the Cult of Aion, a Greek tradition closely aligned with Pythagorean thought. Contrary to the dismissive label of a “math cult,” Pythagoreanism treated numbers as symbolic expressions of cosmic principles rather than tools of calculation.

Within this framework, the impersonal Aion manifested as twin forces:

• Kronos — chaos, limitation, dissolution

• Rhea — order, rhythm, generative flow

“Ladies and gentlemen, tonight we’re going to examine one of the most enduring ideas of modern culture: the belief in space aliens. For over a century, the public has been bombarded with stories of UFOs, crashes, alien pilots, and government cover-ups.

Note: It will be explained lower down the Crowley Association.

But when we peel back the layers of this phenomenon, a very different picture emerges—one not of extraterrestrial visitors, but of human invention, misinterpretation, and manipulation. Let’s begin.”

Part 1: The Mars Craze – Fiction as ‘Fact’

In 1877, during the opposition of Mars, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli observed what he called canali—meaning ‘channels.’ This was mistranslated into English as ‘canals,’ a much more artificial-sounding term. American astronomer Percival Lowell took this mistranslation and ran with it.

The term “Satanic Stupidity” is not a theological insult—it’s a structural diagnosis. It refers to the performative, self-contradictory behaviors of individuals or institutions that invoke rebellion, inversion, or “darkness” as a brand, while simultaneously clinging to the same moral scaffolding they claim to reject. This stupidity is not about intelligence. It’s about functional failure.

Let’s stop pretending

These groups masquerading as spiritual collectives are not sanctuaries of diversity. They’re cosplay cults wrapped in occult aesthetics, parading around as if Philosophical and Theological Satanism are inclusive frameworks. They’re not Warlocks. They’re not Witches. They’re ideological performers using spiritual language to mask exclusion, hostility, and cowardice.

They claim to stand for “All Paths,” yet openly vilify Christianity. They tolerate every worldview except the one they’ve decided to scapegoat. That’s not inclusion. That’s targeted bias. It’s ideological gatekeeping dressed up in robes and runes.

These groups are not spiritual leaders. They are unhinged…

 WHICH ONE IS THE FAKE HERE?

The image is misleading as to which one is the real or the fake, because the craft is wide and diverse.

In truth, both could be real, both could be cosplayers, or worse—one could be a scammer and the other a bully pretending to be an authority. The craft encompasses countless lineages, styles, and approaches; appearance alone tells you nothing.

In Druwayu, we simply use the term craft for the practice and commerce for the profession. A practitioner who specializes professionally is defined by their role:

• the craft of a Warlock = Warlockery

All Hail the One and Three

Overview

This is a loaded question and takes a lot of considerations; there is no single yes/no answer — it depends on how you define “Christian” and “witch,” which scriptures or traditions you accept, and whether you prioritize institutional teaching or personal conscience.

The simplest answer to this is by name at least as such are presented within most Christian traditions, regardless if being misinformed, or the centuries of distortion well into the present of the very meaning of either title, it would be a no. As far as a private personal craft you keep to yourself or a very, very small number of trusted friends and/or family, sure, in that sense you can call yourself whatever you want.

Modern Efforts of More Smear:

Adam is the singular, and Adamu is the plural/collective, designating human beings or a people. The oldest known sources for this terminology appear in Akkadian / Mesopotamian texts, where adāmu / adamu functions as a collective noun for humans or peoples.

The most basic scholarly presentation states that Akkadian adāmu is attested as “people / humans” ca. 2600–2400 BCE. This is correct at the surface level, but incomplete.

Properly speaking, the term refers to those associated with the red lands, that is, people of ʾDM / ʾDWM — later known as Edom / Adom.

The semantic field combines:

• earth / ground,

Many people ask: “Convince me to convert to Druwayu.” 

The honest answer is simple: 

“We share; you determine.” And here’s why that answer is not just a slogan — it is a profound truth about human consciousness, belief, and freedom.

No one can truly convert another person. Even if someone is forced to recite words, go through rituals, or outwardly participate in practices under threat or coercion, that creates external compliance only, not internal conviction or understanding.

Genuine belief arises from personal insight, reflection, and engagement. Authenticity cannot be imposed from outside; no teacher, clergy member, or community can make someone truly embrace a system of thought or spirituality.

All of REVELATION has already been fulfilled/Completed, but rewritten to keep people under a Roman Empire world view of total domination; not true spiritual connectivity and coexistence.

Introduction

The Book of Revelation is frequently treated as a prophecy about the distant future. Yet a careful historical reading shows it as a document deeply embedded in first-century political realities, especially the oppressive reach of Rome. Its most famous symbol—the Dragon—represents imperial Rome: the city of seven hills, the succession of emperors, and the network of client kings and provincial rulers who executed the empire’s will.

Equally important is the Mark of the Beast, often read as abstract allegory. Historically, it has a dual meaning: literal currency bearing imperial imagery, signifying political and economic subjection, and a metaphorical reference to greed and moral compromise, linked to King Solomon as a precursor to Rome’s emphasis on wealth and power.

Viewed in this light,…

Introduction

In the landscape of ancient religious movements, few systems exemplify intellectual misrepresentation as thoroughly as Gnosticism. Frequently marketed as a suppressed wellspring of primordial wisdom, Gnosticism instead reveals itself—under sustained scholarly scrutiny—as a constructed ideology that weaponizes obscurity, mythic invention, and selective textual abuse. Its enduring appeal lies not in historical authenticity or theological coherence, but in its promise of elitism: salvation for the initiated few who claim access to truths allegedly denied to the masses.

What masquerades as “hidden knowledge” is, in reality, a bricolage of late antique philosophical fragments, speculative mythology, and reactionary reinterpretations of Jewish and Christian texts. Gnosticism does not preserve ancient revelation; it retrofits dissatisfaction with the material world into a cosmic grievance narrative, positioning its adherents as victims of both creation and history.

The Fabricated Origins of Gnosticism: Invention by Accretion, Not Apostolic Transmission

No credible evidence supports the claim that Gnosticism represents…