Space Aliens are Occult Inventions: And a Public Scam
“Ladies and gentlemen, tonight we’re going to examine one of the most enduring ideas of modern culture: the belief in space aliens. For over a century, the public has been bombarded with stories of UFOs, crashes, alien pilots, and government cover-ups.
Note: It will be explained lower down the Crowley Association.
But when we peel back the layers of this phenomenon, a very different picture emerges—one not of extraterrestrial visitors, but of human invention, misinterpretation, and manipulation. Let’s begin.”
Part 1: The Mars Craze – Fiction as ‘Fact’
In 1877, during the opposition of Mars, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli observed what he called canali—meaning ‘channels.’ This was mistranslated into English as ‘canals,’ a much more artificial-sounding term. American astronomer Percival Lowell took this mistranslation and ran with it.
Despite the fact that the so-called canals changed over time—a dead giveaway of optical illusion—Lowell published book after book claiming Mars was home to a dying civilization.
By 1908, his ideas had sparked a worldwide fascination with ‘Martian life,’ eagerly picked up by writers like Waldemar Kaempffert. Science fiction and speculative journalism merged, and the ‘Martians’ were born.”
Part 2: Airships and Early UFO Myths
“Next came the ‘airship’ craze of 1896 and 1897. Across the United States, people reported seeing mysterious dirigibles in the sky. In Aurora, Texas, a story emerged of an ‘alien pilot’ killed in a crash. Yet, contemporary investigation suggests the so-called alien may simply have been a foreigner—perhaps French—or that the entire incident was fabricated. These sightings coincided with a boom in experimental aviation and a press eager for sensational headlines.”
Part 3: Occultism and the First ‘New Age’
“The late 19th and early 20th centuries were also a hotbed of occultism and pseudo-scholarship. Figures like Eliphas Levi and Aleister Crowley blurred the lines between mysticism, performance, and delusion.
Crowley in particular indulged in drugs, ritual hallucination, and self-mythologizing. In 1917, he even created an entity he called ‘LAM,’ an image strikingly similar to modern depictions of the ‘gray alien.’ Crowley’s students—Jack Parsons, L. Ron Hubbard of Scientology fame, and Gerald Gardner, founder of Wica (note the original spelling)—would carry these ideas into mid-century counterculture and fringe religion.”
The extra touch which is the most common denominator in all occultist mysticism is to roll in all mythologies together as merely ancient people seeing and tricked to worship and serve the same aliens, or fight them and the rest is morons forming ET and Spaceship Cargo like cults.
Angles, demons, deities, devils, fairies and more all become forms of "shape shifting space bugs and andro-grey flesh drones that have fare too much fascination with butt probing and chooses the anal fetish of Crowley, and the so called magic want of said fairies become both an all purpose tool like Dr. Who's "screw driver" and private sex toy up the butt. (Batteries not included).
Part 4: Technology, War, and Propaganda
During World War II and after, a mix of advanced aircraft and secrecy fueled the UFO mythos. The German Horten 229 flying wing—a real jet-powered craft built in 1944—looked remarkably like many later ‘boomerang-shaped UFOs.
Meanwhile, Alexander Weygers patented the Discopter, a disc-shaped aircraft concept, in 1944. In 1947, pilot Kenneth Arnold reported seeing strange objects over Washington State, describing them as ‘saucer-like.’
Less than a month later, the famous Roswell incident occurred, giving the public its first ‘crashed saucer’ narrative—just as memories of wartime secret projects were still fresh and classified.”
Part 5: Media Amplification
“In 1938, Orson Welles’s radio broadcast of War of the Worlds caused panic among some listeners, a sign of how susceptible the public already was to alien invasion stories. By the 1950s, Cold War paranoia mixed with flying saucer tales, new occult movements, and science fiction into a single cultural stew. By the 1960s and ’70s, drug culture, neo-paganism, and the rise of ‘contactee’ movements turned aliens into angels, saviors, or demons—whatever the believer needed them to be.”
Part 6: The Internet Age and Mass Hoaxes
“In the 1980s, mainstream media’s ‘Satanic Panic’ distracted from real abuses while spreading paranoia about hidden cults. In the 1990s, the so-called ‘New Age’ movement rebranded earlier mysticism with updated artwork and pseudo-science.
The arrival of the internet turbocharged this process. Old hoaxes, myths, and disinformation were given new life and new audiences. Each generation, less grounded in critical thinking, became more vulnerable to manipulation.”
Part 7: Aliens as a Tool of Control
“Today, claims of alien invasions, secret government hearings, or ‘comet swarms’ called alien probes are simply the latest version of the same game. These stories are distractions—ways to create fear, confusion, and division.
People who believe without evidence become easier to manipulate. Those in power—‘the puppet masters,’ as some call them—can then justify surveillance, militarization, or population control by inventing new enemies from the stars.”
Conclusion: The Price of Belief Without Evidence
“So what do we actually have? A trail of mistranslations, hoaxes, hallucinatory visions, secret wartime technology, PSYOPs (Psychological Operations), science fiction stories, and media hysteria—all spun into a mythology of alien visitors.
Believing in aliens (as seen on TV and in the mainstream) on this evidence is not open-mindedness. It is willful ignorance and clinging to imposed fictions and delusions. And it serves the interests of those who would rather have you distracted by fantasies than paying attention to the very real power structures shaping your life.
The truth is simple: the alien invasion we fear is not from space—it’s from within our own culture, our own myths, and our own willingness to believe.”
“This is why skepticism is not just healthy. It’s essential.”
Also, enough with the want to believe bullshit!
The excuse "Well, there could be intelligent life elsewhere" or "It's hypocritical to deny life existing elsewhere in the universe" are not justifications nor proofs.
Hearsay is also not irrefutable evidence. In fact, its the least reliable because people lie to themselves as well as others and the easiest form of indoctrination is self indoctrination. It's also the hardest to break through if ever. Don't be a willing ignorant tool.
And if you have to ask yourself or someone else rhetorically if this whole ET thing is just one mass mind game, or if your being duped, fooled, swindled, tricked, punked, or whatever other slang you want to slap in there, the answer is yes, along with the reality that always proves itself, that when something is over hyped, over pushed and even forced, its a fraud, a scam, a lie.
A Proto-historic Reconstruction
Based on known surviving fragments
Archaeological and textual analysis from Mesopotamia, Anatolia, and the Levant suggests that many early Near Eastern creation and flood traditions share a common mythic ancestry, reflecting both the movements of peoples and the merging of their spiritual systems.
The Adamu and the Red Land
The figure known biblically as Adam appears to be a composite of older Mesopotamian archetypes, most notably the Adamu referenced in Sumerian and Akkadian texts.
The name is linked etymologically to “Adom/Edom/Eden,” terms rooted in adamu (“to make,” “to create”) and adom (“red”), referencing both the clay from which humans were fashioned and the “red lands” — the arid desert regions bordering the Fertile Crescent.
These “people of the red land” were contrasted with the Igigi, associated with “the black land” (Ki-Gir, fertile earth), where Sumerian civilization first flourished along the Tigris and Euphrates.
In Mesopotamian cosmology, the Adamu were originally laborers or cultivators brought in to “work the land” — a motif preserved in Genesis 2:15, where Adam is placed in Eden “to till and to keep it.”
Rebellion and the Birth of Hierarchy
According to the later Akkadian and Babylonian reinterpretations of earlier Sumerian myth, the Igigi (often represented as celestial or semi-divine overseers) grew weary of their labor under the Anunnaki, the ruling “great gods.” A rebellion ensued — the so-called “labor strike of the gods” described in the Atrahasis Epic — leading to the creation of humankind to bear the burden of agricultural and ritual toil.
In this retelling, humans became both the inheritors and the replacements of the Igigi’s duties. Some traditions describe how, following the conflict, humans were granted stewardship of the land — effectively becoming “landowners” under divine rulers. This proto-political hierarchy echoes in the emerging caste systems of ancient Mesopotamia and neighboring regions: the Anunnaki as divine sovereigns; the Igigi or priestly administrators; and the Adamu as common laborers or subjects.
The Anunnaki gradually were turned into a pantheon as a cult of rulers, a divinized aristocracy whose authority became hereditary and sacral. Over time, those deified ancestors or rulers who achieved full divine status were termed EElohim (in West Semitic traditions) or Elim, the “exalted/mighty ones.”
Their interpreters and scribes — the Rabbanim (teachers, from which the Hebrew Rabbi later derives) — preserved and expanded the sacred lore of their lineages while also taking certain liberties over time.
Flood and Renewal: The Age of Ziusudra
Archaeological and geological evidence of localized flooding events around 2900 BCE — particularly in the region of Shuruppak (modern Tell Fara, Iraq) — provides plausible grounding for the flood narratives found in Sumerian and later biblical texts.
The Sumerian hero Ziusudra (“He of Long Life” or “Life of Long Days”) is described in the Eridu Genesis as the last king before the deluge, chosen by the god Enki to survive the flood in a great vessel. His story predates and parallels the Akkadian Atrahasis and the later Hebrew Noah — each iteration embellishing and moralizing the same archetypal event of divine retribution and human renewal.
The “Great Transgression”: The Nephilim and the Fall of Sumer
The so-called “big transgression” (the great mixing) appears across multiple traditions: the Igigi or “Watchers” descending to take wives among the Adamu, giving rise to a hybrid class — the Nephilim (“fallen ones” or “those cast down”).
In Mesopotamian mythology, this episode symbolizes the blurring of divine and human boundaries — a theological crisis that mirrors historical class and political upheavals. The resulting strife, both celestial and terrestrial, corresponds in mythic form to the social collapse and internecine warfare that brought an end to the early Sumerian city-states around the mid-third millennium BCE.
Aftermath: Fragmentation and Cultural Reformation
The fall of Sumer did not extinguish its legacy. Successor civilizations across the Near East — Akkadian, Babylonian, Assyrian, Hittite, Canaanite, and Egyptian — each absorbed fragments of Sumerian cosmology, adapting its divine hierarchies and sacred symbols to local pantheons.
It was applied to Babylon, mainly because of the captivity many Israelis and others endured where the goals were to once again seek the construction of the old Sumerian style ziggurat (a type of pyramid structure) but likely collapsed under its own weight and later used as a morality play of the unchecked and unrestrained pride that always goes before a downfall of a people and an Empire.
In Egypt, the divine kingship of the Anunnaki evolved into the Neteru, with Pharaoh as the living god-king mediating between heaven and earth.
In Canaan and later Israel, El and the Elohim retained echoes of the older Sumerian divine council.
Among the Persians, the cosmic struggle between divine order and chaos (Ahura Mazda vs. Ahriman) reinterpreted the ancient conflicts between gods, humans, and their rebellious kin.
Thus, the mythic lineage of the Adamu, a guy named Ziusudra, and the Nephilim forms not only a prehistory of biblical theology, but also a shared framework for understanding how the ancient peoples of the Middle East envisioned divine authority, human destiny, and the cycles of rebellion and renewal that shaped their civilizations.
No, the Old Gods are Not Returning
They Were Distorted, Overwritten, Eradicated and simply Forgotten
These so-called “revivals” of ancient deities are neither new nor accurate. European pantheons were not merely misinterpreted—they were systematically distorted, overwritten, and in many cases, eradicated. Long before Christianity, Rome and Greece imposed their frameworks onto local beliefs, rewriting and erasing traditions with imperial intent. This overwrite was not passive—it was deliberate cultural annihilation. Roman Catholicism continued the purge, followed by Protestant sects and later Islam, each layering new dogma over the ruins of older systems.
Modern interpretations are steeped in presentism and often misrepresent what they claim to revive. Much of what is labeled “pagan” today is not historically pagan at all. The term itself—originally meaning “peasant” or “bound one”—was a slur, not a spiritual identity. Contemporary “paganism” is largely a patchwork of occultism, fantasy, and political theater. It is not a coherent tradition, but a modern construct masquerading as ancient truth.
So when one claims, “The Gods We Buried Are Rising Again—they lingered in stories, in rituals, in silence”, it must be stated plainly: those stories were rewritten, those rituals were reconstructed, and that silence was enforced through conquest. What is “rising” now is not the gods themselves, but a curated mythology filtered through aesthetic cosplay, identity politics, and selective nostalgia.
The old gods were not buried—they were overwritten, suppressed, and in many cases, eradicated. And crucially, not all deities were abstract forces or mythic archetypes. Many were venerated ancestors—real individuals whose memory was elevated through lineage, ritual, and cultural continuity. To claim “no gods were ever real” is not only historically false, it erases the ancestral foundations of many traditions. These were not metaphors—they were bloodlines, leaders, and protectors, remembered and honored long before imperial systems rebranded them as myths or demons.
Paganism and Heathenry: Occultism in Costume
The modern use of “paganism” and “heathenry” is not a return to ancient belief systems—it is a superficial trapping for common occultism. Most of what is presented as ancient lore was invented or reinterpreted during the late 1700s onward, particularly during the Romantic and Victorian periods. These reinterpretations were based on assumptions, blind speculation, and nationalistic myth-making—not on preserved doctrine or continuous tradition.
Invented Lineage: Many modern pagan practices trace back to 18th–19th century writers who had no access to original sources and relied on fragmented folklore, Christian polemics, or outright fabrication.
Occult Substitution: Rituals, symbols, and “pantheons” were often borrowed from ceremonial magic, Theosophy, and later Wicca—none of which reflect the actual practices of pre-Christian societies.
Academic Contamination: Early anthropology and comparative religion studies were riddled with colonial bias, Christian framing, and speculative reconstruction. These flawed foundations were later treated as fact.
Identity Theater: Today’s “heathen” and “pagan” movements often serve as vehicles for aesthetic rebellion, political signaling, or personal branding—not spiritual continuity.
In short, what is called “paganism” today is not a revival—it is a repackaging. It is cosplay layered over occultism, with historical claims built on sand. The gods were not preserved—they were replaced. And the rituals were not inherited—they were invented.
Forgotten Deities and Vanished Lineages
Some deities were not destroyed—they were simply forgotten. Entire cultures vanished without leaving written records or successors to carry their traditions forward. Their gods, rituals, and beliefs dissolved with them. We cannot claim to know what these people believed, nor can we reconstruct their spiritual systems with any certainty.
This includes cousin species of humans such as Neanderthals, whose burial sites and artifacts suggest spiritual awareness—but offer no clear doctrine, no preserved mythos, and no interpretable theology. To assert knowledge of their beliefs is pure speculation. Those who claim certainty are not preserving truth—they are manufacturing it.
Conclusion
To speak of rising gods without acknowledging their destruction is historical malpractice. To claim spiritual continuity while practicing modern occultism under borrowed names is misrepresentation. And to call this “tradition” is to ignore the centuries of distortion, suppression, and reinvention that severed the original lineages.
What remains is not sacred—it is synthetic. And those who seek truth must begin by discarding the fiction.
