THE SPEW ZONE

Opening Statement

I did not expect to enter this debate, but one thing must be made clear: twisting words, redefining terms by association, and misrepresenting arguments are destructive habits. They fuel ignorance, which in turn breeds arrogance. This is especially evident in the abortion debate.

Key Points

• Weak Argument from Opponents

  • Critics of Pro-Life positions often demand: “Where in the Bible does it say abortion?”

 WHICH ONE IS THE FAKE HERE?

The image is misleading as to which one is the real or the fake, because the craft is wide and diverse.

In truth, both could be real, both could be cosplayers, or worse—one could be a scammer and the other a bully pretending to be an authority. The craft encompasses countless lineages, styles, and approaches; appearance alone tells you nothing.

In Druwayu, we simply use the term craft for the practice and commerce for the profession. A practitioner who specializes professionally is defined by their role:

• the craft of a Warlock = Warlockery

An Aggressive Critique of Feminist Supremacist Tendencies

Feminism, by definition and historical self‑description, has always been “pro‑women.” From its earliest formulations, however, its rhetoric and institutional practices have often contained a persistent antagonism toward male‑associated social structures, rather than a neutral pursuit of equal treatment under law.

Such antagonism moves beyond critique of specific practices into structural opposition, a hallmark of supremacist logics when abstract norms are elevated above empirical nuance.

1. Co‑Optation of Suffrage and Early Legal Movements

The first wave of feminism in the late 19th and early 20th centuries focused on concrete legal reforms: property rights, voting access, and contractual autonomy. 

Introduction

In the landscape of ancient religious movements, few systems exemplify intellectual misrepresentation as thoroughly as Gnosticism. Frequently marketed as a suppressed wellspring of primordial wisdom, Gnosticism instead reveals itself—under sustained scholarly scrutiny—as a constructed ideology that weaponizes obscurity, mythic invention, and selective textual abuse. Its enduring appeal lies not in historical authenticity or theological coherence, but in its promise of elitism: salvation for the initiated few who claim access to truths allegedly denied to the masses.

What masquerades as “hidden knowledge” is, in reality, a bricolage of late antique philosophical fragments, speculative mythology, and reactionary reinterpretations of Jewish and Christian texts. Gnosticism does not preserve ancient revelation; it retrofits dissatisfaction with the material world into a cosmic grievance narrative, positioning its adherents as victims of both creation and history.

The Fabricated Origins of Gnosticism: Invention by Accretion, Not Apostolic Transmission

No credible evidence supports the claim that Gnosticism represents…