THE SPEW ZONE

Are We Really Entering a Sixth Mass Extinction?

A Critical Look at the Claims, the Counterclaims, and the Actual Evidence

Public conversations about biodiversity loss have become increasingly polarized. On one side, media outlets publish dramatic headlines warning that Earth is plunging into a sixth mass extinction. On the other, new research challenges the idea entirely, suggesting that extinction rates may actually be declining. Both narratives claim scientific authority. Both claim urgency. And both, when examined closely, reveal significant flaws in reasoning, methodology, and communication.

To understand what is actually happening, we need to step back from sensationalism and examine the claims with clarity. This essay dissects the fallacies in the MSNBC article written by Jay Marc Nojada, evaluates the limitations of the University of Arizona study that challenges it, and then reconstructs the consistent facts supported by real evidence.

The MSNBC Article by Jay Marc Nojada:

Do you sometimes reflect on deep questions about existence that remain unanswered by conventional explanations?

Many people wonder about the challenges, mysteries, and seeming contradictions in life, such as:

• Why is there suffering and injustice in the world?

• Why are some children born with physical challenges?

• Why do dishonest people prosper while good people suffer?

Regression Fallacy: Ascribing a cause where none exists in situations where natural fluctuations exist, while failing to account for natural fluctuations.

Infinite regress is not a sufficient explanatory mechanism. It does not resolve the problem it is invoked to answer but instead postpones it indefinitely. Each belief or claim is said to be justified by another, which itself requires justification, and so on without end. This structure provides no grounding point—it defers resolution rather than offering one.

Beliefs are not equivalent to facts. 

While beliefs may be informed by facts, they remain interpretations, models, or assumptions. A belief cannot ultimately justify another belief without some form of evidence or shared foundation. Otherwise, the structure risks circularity or infinite regress: “A is true because of B, B is true because of C, and so on without closure.” This is not explanation but deferral.

In cosmological contexts, infinite regress fails to answer origin questions. 

The Origin of the Samhain-Halloween Link: Sir John Rhys and the Fictional “Celtic Cult of the Dead” Hypothesis

Everything you think you know about Halloween vs. what is constantly regurgitated and claimed without factual investigation is complete fiction pawned off as facts. Even the various associated or claimed names are nonsense. So let's get right to it.

Etymology of “Halloween”

Halloween is a Christian vigil observance marking the evening before All Saints’ Day. Its name derives from Middle and Old English terms for “holy evening.”

• Form: Halloween is a contraction of All Hallows’ Even (or All Hallows’ Eve)

SANTA WAS GREEK; CHRISTMAS ISN'T PAGAN

🌟 Etymology:

I am adding this part as some have made comments about the meaning of the word, which is not the point of this article. However, to address it, one commentator stated: Christmas isn’t even Christmas. It’s Christ Mass, and I’m not Catholic.

This is the problem today with so many things and what I combat because though the intention may have been honorable, the comment is incorrect. Christ- is obviously still part of the word. But lets get a bit more precise.

The English term Christmas (“Christ’s mass” or “mass on Christ’s day”) is of fairly recent origin. The term originated from the Middle English Christemasse, which came from the Old English Cristes mæsse.

Opening Statement

I did not expect to enter this debate, but one thing must be made clear: twisting words, redefining terms by association, and misrepresenting arguments are destructive habits. They fuel ignorance, which in turn breeds arrogance. This is especially evident in the abortion debate.

Key Points

• Weak Argument from Opponents

  • Critics of Pro-Life positions often demand: “Where in the Bible does it say abortion?”

We frequently encounter individuals who deliberately provoke others by filming without consent and citing laws they don’t fully understand. This behavior not only undermines respectful interaction but also encourages others to imitate it, often leading to unnecessary conflict. Such actions are disruptive, irresponsible, and occur far too often.

It happens all the time—some jerk shoving cameras in people’s faces, pretending to “quote the law” when they clearly don’t know what they’re talking about. All they do is bait others into copying the same reckless nonsense, which just gets more people in trouble. It’s childish, it’s toxic, and it’s way too common.

We’ve all seen it—someone trying to stir up drama by sticking a camera in people’s faces and throwing around fake “legal talk.” Others intentionally staging events to evoke and create false rage narratives. Honestly, it’s just childish, and it happens way more than it should. So, I am addressing…

Who Ordered the Shutdowns — and Who Issued the Federal Mandates?

A comprehensive, sourced chronology from the first lockdowns to the Biden-era federal vaccine mandates — written so you can rebut simplified partisan claims that “Trump was a dictator” when, in fact, the most sweeping federal employment-based mandates occurred under President Biden and imposed true authoritarian and totalitarian dictatorship.

Because the subject has become overheated I asked several AI:

These were the result of AI systems instructed to leave out "opinions" and arrive at conclusions that are not based not social-political sides. It was informed its about analysis. Not opinion or feelings. Just simple math.

AI systems used include Grok, ChatGPT, Copilot, Google Gemini, Claude, Meta AI, and Perplexity AI. They were given the same instructions and to provide the most reliable, consistent and comparative results and instructed to address one another if biases were creeping in and to remove…

The judiciary was never meant to be a podium for ideological performance. It was designed as a firewall—neutral, restrained, and bound by the Constitution. But across the country, that firewall is collapsing. Judges are abandoning their role as interpreters of law and instead weaponizing the bench to enforce personal agendas. This is not interpretation. It’s insubordination.

Judges Are Not Legislators—Stop Pretending

The Constitution assigns judges a narrow function: interpret the law as written. Not rewrite it. Not inject social preferences. Not act as moral referees. When judges block executive orders, redefine historical context, or selectively enforce constitutional protections, they violate the separation of powers. They destabilize the legal system. They become rogue operators cloaked in judicial immunity.

It’s a breach of Article III authority. It’s a direct assault on the structure of American governance.

Urbanski’s Ruling: Fiction Masquerading as Law

Aion, Trinity, and the Engineered Compression of Theology

The concept of the Trinity has its roots in what was known as the Cult of Aion, a Greek tradition closely aligned with Pythagorean thought. Contrary to the dismissive label of a “math cult,” Pythagoreanism treated numbers as symbolic expressions of cosmic principles rather than tools of calculation.

Within this framework, the impersonal Aion manifested as twin forces:

• Kronos — chaos, limitation, dissolution

• Rhea — order, rhythm, generative flow

“Ladies and gentlemen, tonight we’re going to examine one of the most enduring ideas of modern culture: the belief in space aliens. For over a century, the public has been bombarded with stories of UFOs, crashes, alien pilots, and government cover-ups.

Note: It will be explained lower down the Crowley Association.

But when we peel back the layers of this phenomenon, a very different picture emerges—one not of extraterrestrial visitors, but of human invention, misinterpretation, and manipulation. Let’s begin.”

Part 1: The Mars Craze – Fiction as ‘Fact’

In 1877, during the opposition of Mars, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli observed what he called canali—meaning ‘channels.’ This was mistranslated into English as ‘canals,’ a much more artificial-sounding term. American astronomer Percival Lowell took this mistranslation and ran with it.

 WHICH ONE IS THE FAKE HERE?

The image is misleading as to which one is the real or the fake, because the craft is wide and diverse.

In truth, both could be real, both could be cosplayers, or worse—one could be a scammer and the other a bully pretending to be an authority. The craft encompasses countless lineages, styles, and approaches; appearance alone tells you nothing.

In Druwayu, we simply use the term craft for the practice and commerce for the profession. A practitioner who specializes professionally is defined by their role:

• the craft of a Warlock = Warlockery

All Hail the One and Three

Overview

This is a loaded question and takes a lot of considerations; there is no single yes/no answer — it depends on how you define “Christian” and “witch,” which scriptures or traditions you accept, and whether you prioritize institutional teaching or personal conscience.

The simplest answer to this is by name at least as such are presented within most Christian traditions, regardless if being misinformed, or the centuries of distortion well into the present of the very meaning of either title, it would be a no. As far as a private personal craft you keep to yourself or a very, very small number of trusted friends and/or family, sure, in that sense you can call yourself whatever you want.

Modern Efforts of More Smear:

Adam is the singular, and Adamu is the plural/collective, designating human beings or a people. The oldest known sources for this terminology appear in Akkadian / Mesopotamian texts, where adāmu / adamu functions as a collective noun for humans or peoples.

The most basic scholarly presentation states that Akkadian adāmu is attested as “people / humans” ca. 2600–2400 BCE. This is correct at the surface level, but incomplete.

Properly speaking, the term refers to those associated with the red lands, that is, people of ʾDM / ʾDWM — later known as Edom / Adom.

The semantic field combines:

• earth / ground,

Almost a Decade of Speculation

Almost a decade of speculation began on September 4, 2018, when the YouTube channel Bright Insight presented a provocative but carefully framed idea: not only might the lost city of Atlantis have actually existed, but its true location may have been hiding in plain sight for thousands of years—overlooked simply because scholars and enthusiasts alike had been searching in all the wrong places.

That proposal did not emerge in a vacuum. The debate over the location of Atlantis has long resembled a mirror maze. Plato never finished his account, and what he did record was already several steps removed from the original source. In the centuries since, countless researchers, amateurs, and even national interests have attempted to anchor Atlantis in their own proverbial backyards.

From the Mediterranean to the Americas, most theories suffer from the same fundamental flaw: selective reading driven by confirmation bias.

Yet among…

Many people ask: “Convince me to convert to Druwayu.” 

The honest answer is simple: 

“We share; you determine.” And here’s why that answer is not just a slogan — it is a profound truth about human consciousness, belief, and freedom.

No one can truly convert another person. Even if someone is forced to recite words, go through rituals, or outwardly participate in practices under threat or coercion, that creates external compliance only, not internal conviction or understanding.

Genuine belief arises from personal insight, reflection, and engagement. Authenticity cannot be imposed from outside; no teacher, clergy member, or community can make someone truly embrace a system of thought or spirituality.

Introduction

Religious liberty in the United States is a foundational constitutional principle, protected under the First Amendment and applied to the states via the Fourteenth Amendment. The U.S. Constitution protects belief absolutely while conduct is conditionally protected. Religious belief may guide conscience, but conduct may be regulated or prohibited when it conflicts with public safety, civil rights, or the constitutional order. This framework ensures that all Americans—believers and non-believers alike—enjoy freedom of conscience, equality under the law, and protection from coercion or domination by religious authorities.

Governing Constitutional Principle

The U.S. Constitution protects belief absolutely and conduct conditionally.

Conduct loses First Amendment protection when it infringes:

Introduction

In the landscape of ancient religious movements, few systems exemplify intellectual misrepresentation as thoroughly as Gnosticism. Frequently marketed as a suppressed wellspring of primordial wisdom, Gnosticism instead reveals itself—under sustained scholarly scrutiny—as a constructed ideology that weaponizes obscurity, mythic invention, and selective textual abuse. Its enduring appeal lies not in historical authenticity or theological coherence, but in its promise of elitism: salvation for the initiated few who claim access to truths allegedly denied to the masses.

What masquerades as “hidden knowledge” is, in reality, a bricolage of late antique philosophical fragments, speculative mythology, and reactionary reinterpretations of Jewish and Christian texts. Gnosticism does not preserve ancient revelation; it retrofits dissatisfaction with the material world into a cosmic grievance narrative, positioning its adherents as victims of both creation and history.

The Fabricated Origins of Gnosticism: Invention by Accretion, Not Apostolic Transmission

No credible evidence supports the claim that Gnosticism represents…