THE SPEW ZONE

Regression Fallacy: Ascribing a cause where none exists in situations where natural fluctuations exist, while failing to account for natural fluctuations.

Infinite regress is not a sufficient explanatory mechanism. It does not resolve the problem it is invoked to answer but instead postpones it indefinitely. Each belief or claim is said to be justified by another, which itself requires justification, and so on without end. This structure provides no grounding point—it defers resolution rather than offering one.

Beliefs are not equivalent to facts. 

While beliefs may be informed by facts, they remain interpretations, models, or assumptions. A belief cannot ultimately justify another belief without some form of evidence or shared foundation. Otherwise, the structure risks circularity or infinite regress: “A is true because of B, B is true because of C, and so on without closure.” This is not explanation but deferral.

In cosmological contexts, infinite regress fails to answer origin questions. 

Opening Statement

I did not expect to enter this debate, but one thing must be made clear: twisting words, redefining terms by association, and misrepresenting arguments are destructive habits. They fuel ignorance, which in turn breeds arrogance. This is especially evident in the abortion debate.

Key Points

• Weak Argument from Opponents

  • Critics of Pro-Life positions often demand: “Where in the Bible does it say abortion?”

Who Ordered the Shutdowns — and Who Issued the Federal Mandates?

A comprehensive, sourced chronology from the first lockdowns to the Biden-era federal vaccine mandates — written so you can rebut simplified partisan claims that “Trump was a dictator” when, in fact, the most sweeping federal employment-based mandates occurred under President Biden and imposed true authoritarian and totalitarian dictatorship.

Because the subject has become overheated I asked several AI:

These were the result of AI systems instructed to leave out "opinions" and arrive at conclusions that are not based not social-political sides. It was informed its about analysis. Not opinion or feelings. Just simple math.

AI systems used include Grok, ChatGPT, Copilot, Google Gemini, Claude, Meta AI, and Perplexity AI. They were given the same instructions and to provide the most reliable, consistent and comparative results and instructed to address one another if biases were creeping in and to remove…

Recent questions have occurred where many want to know where the First Church of Druwayu stands on several factors, especially in regards to medical treatments and the practice of medicine. This is seldom talked about by other established religions, new or old, and when it is, it ted to be sensationalist rhetoric about some particular identity that refuses all treatment to the detriment of the lives of children.

This is because some "New Religious Movements" tend to have some very odd, if not completely irrational views when it comes to factors of health, biology and real world sciences while others are merely parodies and it is simply "assumed" everyone part of those groups embrace science and medicine which isn't always the case.

The following covers this and begins with the The Physician’s Pledge Declaration of Geneva (2017):

As a member of the medical profession:

• I solemnly pledge to dedicate my…

 WHICH ONE IS THE FAKE HERE?

The image is misleading as to which one is the real or the fake, because the craft is wide and diverse.

In truth, both could be real, both could be cosplayers, or worse—one could be a scammer and the other a bully pretending to be an authority. The craft encompasses countless lineages, styles, and approaches; appearance alone tells you nothing.

In Druwayu, we simply use the term craft for the practice and commerce for the profession. A practitioner who specializes professionally is defined by their role:

• the craft of a Warlock = Warlockery

All Hail the One and Three

Overview

This is a loaded question and takes a lot of considerations; there is no single yes/no answer — it depends on how you define “Christian” and “witch,” which scriptures or traditions you accept, and whether you prioritize institutional teaching or personal conscience.

The simplest answer to this is by name at least as such are presented within most Christian traditions, regardless if being misinformed, or the centuries of distortion well into the present of the very meaning of either title, it would be a no. As far as a private personal craft you keep to yourself or a very, very small number of trusted friends and/or family, sure, in that sense you can call yourself whatever you want.

Modern Efforts of More Smear: