Fuck Oregon's Democratic Marxist Dictatorship!
WAKE THE FUCK UP!
For you idiots falling for this nonsense without conducting even minimal investigation—regurgitating laws you plainly do not understand while broadcasting your ignorance—burn this into your tiny, malfunctioning brains:
1. ICE Operates Under Administrative Authority, Not Criminal Authority
ICE enforces civil immigration law, not criminal law. Unlawful presence is a civil violation, which is why ICE uses administrative warrants, not judicial ones, to arrest and detain individuals for removal.
ICE issues its own warrants—Forms I-200 and I-205—signed by authorized ICE officers, not judges. These warrants target individuals allegedly removable under federal immigration law.
This is fundamentally different from criminal arrests, which require judicial warrants issued by a judge based on probable cause. Apples and oranges, you absolute fools.
2. Congress Explicitly Granted ICE Arrest Authority Without Judicial Warrants
Federal law grants ICE broad statutory authority to arrest individuals for immigration violations without judicial warrants.
The Congressional Research Service spells it out plainly:
ICE possesses “considerable authority to arrest and detain aliens identified for removal” under federal statutes that have remained largely unchanged across administrations.
This authority is embedded directly in immigration law. It does not depend on criminal warrant procedures. Accept reality.
3. Administrative Warrants Are Legally Sufficient for Civil Immigration Arrests
Administrative warrants are fully legitimate because:
Federal immigration statutes explicitly authorize them
Designated immigration officers issue them
They apply to civil violations, not criminal offenses
Even Nolo’s legal guides—written for laypeople—explain that administrative warrants differ from judicial warrants but are entirely valid for immigration enforcement. Stop pretending otherwise, clowns.
4. ICE Does Not Need a Warrant at All in Many Situations
ICE can arrest without any warrant when:
An officer has reason to believe a person is removable
The arrest occurs in a public place
The officer believes the person may escape before a warrant can be obtained
These powers come straight from federal immigration statutes, as documented by CRS. Your ignorance is not a legal defense.
5. Judicial Warrants Do Not Exist in the Immigration System
Judicial warrants apply to criminal cases. Immigration violations are civil, therefore:
Immigration judges do not issue arrest warrants
Federal criminal courts do not issue warrants for civil removability
ICE officers are the authorized officials who issue administrative warrants
FindLaw even notes that people like you get confused because you assume all arrests require judicial warrants. Immigration law is a separate system. Learn it.
Why ICE Ignores Your Judicial-Warrant Whining
ICE does not need judicial warrants to apprehend or deport undocumented (illegal) immigrants because:
Immigration enforcement is civil, not criminal
Federal law explicitly authorizes ICE to arrest and detain without judicial warrants
ICE-issued administrative warrants are legally sufficient
ICE can arrest without any warrant in many public-place scenarios
Judicial warrants do not exist in the immigration system
So stop demanding something that legally cannot be issued. You look stupid.
Why States Cannot Override Federal Law (For the Constitutionally Illiterate)
1. The Supremacy Clause
The U.S. Constitution declares federal law the “supreme Law of the Land.” This means:
Federal law overrides conflicting state law
States cannot nullify or block federal statutes
State officials are bound by oath to uphold federal law
The Supreme Court has reaffirmed this for over two centuries. There is no debate. Only denial.
2. What Is and Is Not Treason
The Constitution defines treason narrowly:
Levying war against the United States
Giving aid and comfort to its enemies
Knowingly harboring and protecting enemies of the United States does meet that standard.
However, unconstitutional state obstruction—while illegal—is not automatically treason. It is corrected through federal courts. Learn the difference before running your mouth.
3. What States Are Prohibited From Doing
States may not:
Block federal officers from performing lawful duties
Enact laws that contradict federal statutes
Nullify federal authority
Interfere with federal immigration enforcement
Obstruct federal agencies operating within the state
Federal courts routinely crush these attempts. History is not on your side.
4. What States Can Do
States may:
Challenge federal laws in court
Decline to use state resources (anti-commandeering doctrine)
Legislate in areas not federally preempted
What they cannot do is obstruct federal officers or prevent execution of federal law. End of discussion.
For Oregon-Specific Morons
The majority of Oregon is federal land. You do not control it. You cannot interfere with it. Educate yourselves or shut up.
Oregon Politicians and Open Defiance of Federal Law
Listen carefully, brain-dead cheerleaders:
Oregon’s leadership—particularly Governor Tina Kotek—is not engaging in “resistance.” They are violating federal law, erasing separation of powers, trampling constitutional rights, and usurping federal authority.
That isn’t bravery. It’s betrayal.
A. Sanctuary Laws as Active Obstruction
Oregon’s sanctuary laws deliberately block cooperation with ICE. Kotek openly refuses to repeal them while falsely claiming they don’t interfere with federal enforcement.
They do.
Threatening investigations and prosecutions of ICE agents for enforcing deportations is active obstruction, not passive non-cooperation.
That is aid and comfort to those undermining U.S. borders.
Call it what it is and stuff your hypocrisy.
B. Executive Power Grabs and Separation-of-Powers Violations
Kotek has repeatedly acted as a one-woman legislature:
Her December 2024 executive order mandating union-only labor on infrastructure projects was blocked by courts as an unconstitutional power grab
Contractors sued over illegal overreach violating Oregon’s constitution
Her resistance to federal National Guard activation blurred state and federal military authority
This is textbook separation-of-powers abuse.
C. Rights Violations and Federal Usurpation
Under Kotek:
Overbroad “domestic terrorism” laws chill First Amendment activity
State charges against federal agents ignore supremacy and due process
Title IX defiance tramples equal protection for female athletes
Interference on federal land violates Article IV authority
This isn’t governance. It’s lawless defiance.
Selective Enforcement: Hypocrisy in Action
Oregon Democrats enforce laws only when politically convenient.
Rioters aligned with favored causes skate
Opponents get crushed
Federal agents enforcing immigration law get harassed
Gun laws target law-abiding citizens while violent crime spikes
That’s not justice. It’s ideological enforcement.
This isn’t “progress.” It isn’t “resistance.” It isn’t “equity.” It’s selective enforcement, constitutional sabotage, and authoritarian behavior wrapped in blue branding.
If you support it, you’re not enlightened—you’re complicit.
And now, the Kotex is furthering other back door agendas that are painfully obvious with who she is "appointing" and what her primary criteria is for placing people in such positions that, like herself, are completely unqualified to be so appointed which her supporters have also openly praised.
D. Ideological Patronage and Illegal Discriminatory Appointments
Kotek’s abuse of power doesn’t stop at obstruction and overreach—it extends into blatant ideological and identity-based patronage, in direct violation of state and federal anti-discrimination law.
Under her administration, appointments to key boards, agencies, and advisory bodies show a pattern so obvious it borders on parody:
positions of authority are increasingly filled not on merit, experience, or neutrality, but on sexual orientation, ideological conformity, and loyalty to a narrow activist identity bloc.
Let’s be crystal clear for the slow learners:
Sexual orientation is a protected class under both Oregon and federal law (That includes heterosexuals, not their exclusion).
Appointments or employment decisions made on that basis are illegal, just as they would be if based on race, religion, or sex.
Public officials do not get an exemption because they wrap discrimination in “representation” rhetoric.
Yet Kotek has repeatedly signaled—publicly and proudly—that her appointment strategy prioritizes sexual identity and activist alignment, particularly elevating individuals who mirror her own orientation and ideological worldview, while systematically excluding dissenting perspectives from decision-making authority.
This is not “diversity.” It is state-sanctioned favoritism.
When entire agencies become monocultures—staffed and led by people selected primarily for identity and ideology—the result is institutional bias, policy capture, and hostility toward anyone outside the favored class.
That violates:
Equal protection principles
State and federal employment law
The constitutional duty to govern for all citizens, not a protected political subculture
Turning public institutions into activist safe spaces is not governance. It is discriminatory exclusion using taxpayer money.
E. Weaponizing Government to Engineer an Ideological State
The broader objective is obvious to anyone not pretending otherwise.
Kotek’s governance model is not pluralistic. It is transformational and exclusionary—an attempt to remake Oregon’s power structure so that only one ideological identity is represented, protected, and promoted, while others are sidelined, silenced, or treated as political enemies.
Key consequences of this approach:
State agencies lose neutrality
Policy decisions become activist-driven rather than evidence-based
Citizens outside the favored ideology are effectively locked out of influence
Dissent is framed as “hate” rather than disagreement
That is not democracy.
That is ideological entrenchment.
Government exists to administer law impartially, not to engineer a cultural or sexual hierarchy where access to power depends on identity alignment.
When a governor uses appointment authority to reshape institutions around personal ideology and identity, it is no different in principle from religious favoritism or racial patronage—and it is just as unlawful.
Bottom Line
Appointing officials based on sexual orientation rather than qualification is illegal
Using government to privilege one identity bloc excludes others by definition
Ideological capture of institutions destroys equal protection
Oregon is being governed for a faction, not the public
This is not tolerance. It is discrimination with a rainbow coat of paint.
And no amount of moral posturing changes the law.
Four Main Reasons:
Bad Management
Shit Math
Poor Planning
Fraud
According to Representative Cyrus Javadi
" I hear a lot of people ask, “Why are we paying for ODOT’s screw-ups?” Fair question. But you’re not. Not really.
Here’s what I mean.
To plan for that, they have to guess how much maintenance will cost over the next two years. It’s an educated guess, but still a guess, because weather, fuel prices, labor shortages, commodity prices, inflation, and disaster cleanup all swing wildly from year to year.
And, when the guess is off, the maintenance budget comes up short. Every. Single. Time.
But here's the thing: even if the guess were perfect, the money still wouldn’t be enough. Not by a mile. So, ODOT starts every budget cycle knowing they’ll have to defer some maintenance and hope nothing catastrophic happens.
Why? Because the State Highway Fund, which comes mostly from the gas tax, hasn’t brought in enough to cover basic needs for a very long time. They estimate how many gallons Oregonians will buy, multiply it by 40 cents, and that number becomes the spending cap. If it’s not enough (and it never is), things get pushed off.
That’s exactly why we need at least the six-cent increase. Not because of a mistake. But because the basic cost of asphalt, steel, concrete, labor, equipment, and emergency work keeps climbing, and the revenue hasn’t kept up.
Keep in mind, the six cent increase still doesn’t catch us up. It only keeps us from falling even farther behind.
When ODOT came back to the legislature in 2025 and said, “We can’t cut any more maintenance,” the legislature had two options: cut services and let the system deteriorate, or add revenue.
Six cents was the smallest lever that kept the doors open and the crews working.
You don’t have to love any of this. I don’t. But the honest explanation is simple: Oregonians aren’t paying for an accounting mistake, they’re paying the actual cost of keeping roads safe, drivable, and open.
And even then, it’s not enough.'
He then added nonsense imagery such as the following which is both misleading on one hand and a blatant fraud on the other.
🔎 Rebuttal: False or Misleading Claims in the Statement
1. “You’re not paying for ODOT’s screw-ups.”
False framing: Oregonians are paying for ODOT’s mismanagement. HB 2017 (“Keep Oregon Moving”):
Raised gas tax by 10¢ in phases: +4¢ in 2018, +2¢ in 2020, 2022, and 2024. HB 2017 layered new taxes (gas tax hikes, registration surcharges, payroll taxes) precisely because ODOT failed to prioritize within constitutional limits.
Constitutional fact: Article IX, Sec. 3a requires highway funds to be used only for highway purposes. Misallocation or poor forecasting is not excused by raising taxes.
2. “They have to guess how much maintenance will cost… Every. Single. Time.”
Misleading: Budget forecasting is standard, but ODOT has statutory formulas and historical data. HB 2017 already phased in predictable increases to account for inflation and rising costs.
False implication: This is not “guesswork” — it’s structured budgeting. Claiming chronic shortfalls every cycle ignores that ODOT receives billions annually from dedicated highway revenues.
3. “Even if the guess were perfect, the money still wouldn’t be enough.”
False: HB 2017 raised the gas tax by 10¢ in phases, plus registration surcharges, plus payroll taxes. These increases were designed to cover maintenance and capital projects.
No evidence: There is no statutory or constitutional “maintenance cap” (the alleged “6%” figure is fabricated). Maintenance is funded within the highway purposes mandate.
4. “The State Highway Fund… hasn’t brought in enough to cover basic needs for a very long time.”
False: The Highway Fund is constitutionally protected and has grown steadily with tax increases. HB 2017 alone added billions in new revenue streams.
Misleading math: Gas tax revenue is not capped at “40 cents × gallons sold.” HB 2017 raised the rate to 40¢ by 2024, but the fund also includes registration fees, weight‑mile taxes, and other constitutionally dedicated revenues.
5. “That’s exactly why we need at least the six‑cent increase.”
False claim: There is no constitutional or statutory requirement for a “six‑cent increase.” HB 2017 already phased in 10¢. Any new increase is a political choice, not a constitutional necessity.
Misleading: Suggesting that six cents is the “smallest lever” ignores that ODOT could reprioritize spending within existing revenues.
6. “The six cent increase still doesn’t catch us up.”
Unsupported: No legislative or audit report establishes that a six‑cent increase is insufficient. This is rhetoric, not documented fact.
Reality: EV owners already pay disproportionately higher fees (up to $115/year (not counting per‑mile charges)totaling ~$632 over 4 years. Adding more gas tax hikes compounds inequity without addressing efficiency.
Per‑Mile Charges: Oregon will mandate ~2.3¢/mile or a flat $340/year starting 2027.
If combined with registration surcharges, EV drivers pay more than gas‑vehicle owners, undermining adoption.
7. “ODOT came back to the legislature in 2025 and said, ‘We can’t cut any more maintenance.’”
Misleading: ODOT’s testimony often emphasizes funding gaps, but audits show inefficiencies and mismanagement. “Can’t cut any more” is a political statement, not a constitutional or statutory fact.
Reality: The legislature has discretion to redirect priorities within highway purposes; it is not bound to raise taxes.
8. “Six cents was the smallest lever that kept the doors open and the crews working.”
False framing: ODOT’s crews are funded by constitutionally dedicated revenues. HB 2017 already secured long‑term funding streams. Claiming “doors would close” without six cents is fear‑mongering.
Reality: The Highway Fund cannot be diverted to non‑highway uses, so “keeping doors open” is not contingent on arbitrary tax hikes.
9. “Oregonians aren’t paying for an accounting mistake, they’re paying the actual cost of keeping roads safe.”
False: Oregonians are paying for ODOT’s inefficiencies and layered taxation. EV owners in particular pay more than gas‑vehicle owners, despite lower road impact.
Reality: HB 2017’s revenue streams already cover highway purposes. Additional increases are not about “safety” but about expanding ODOT’s budget beyond efficient use.
⚠️ Additional Adverse Effects Ignored
Equity: EV drivers face stacked fees (registration + per‑mile), discouraging adoption.
Ratepayer burden: Grid upgrades for EV charging shift billions in costs onto households.
Environmental strain: Transmission expansion impacts habitats; fossil fuels still backstop peak demand.
Economic impact: Oregon already ranks among the highest in gas taxes nationally; further increases compound household strain.
Grid Strain: Oregon’s energy strategy projects a 9 GW shortfall by 2030, risking rolling blackouts.
Utilities must invest heavily in transmission and charging infrastructure, with costs passed to ratepayers.
Mixed Energy Sources: Oregon’s electricity mix still includes natural gas and coal alongside hydro and renewables. EVs therefore reduce but do not eliminate fossil fuel reliance.
Disproportionate Burden:
Individuals, not corporations, bear EV fees unless companies own fleets.
Everyday citizens face rising costs while large corporate emitters avoid EV‑specific charges.
🧩 Closing Rebuttal
The claim that “six cents is the smallest lever” is false and misleading. Oregon’s Constitution already dedicates highway revenues, HB 2017 already raised taxes, and EV owners already pay disproportionately. Oregonians are not simply “paying for asphalt and steel” — they are paying for ODOT’s inefficiencies, layered taxation, and misplaced priorities.
THE CAPITAL OF SHIT
Oregon's Housing Crisis Bullshit
Oregon’s housing shortage and financial system is a goddamn disaster (and that's the soft side of things): Even those spineless lawmakers admit the state is “woefully short” on housing, but they do fuck all about it.
The claim young families can't buy homes is more myth than reality. The problem is the insane crime rates. So its not just Illegals being used as tools and near slave labor because illegals have no actual rights (and shouldn't be here anyways). Someone without specific rights, especially when it comes to employment and work conditions "don't report" safety and other violations. That's the reality of illegals in the work force. The rest is just the symptoms.
Costs skyrocketing while wages stagnate: Rent hikes crush income growth every damn time, leaving thousands on the brink of eviction. Wages get jacked up, but so does everything else, trapping everyone in a endless, redundant loop of pointless, soul-sucking bullshit.
Permits plummeting: Local governments are shitting out fewer housing permits, making the supply crunch worse by trashing options for individuals and multi-family homes like the incompetent assholes they are.
Homelessness exploding: Despite flushing billions down the toilet, homelessness surged in 2024. Most of these poor bastards are still holding down jobs, forced to couch-surf or crash with parents or relatives—if they're lucky. But even that's turning into a nightmare thanks to all the idiotic, overreaching "regulations" and bullshit restrictions on converting rooms into bedrooms.
What These Worthless Politicians Are Actually Doing (Or Not)
The latest installed piece of shit, Governor Tina Kotek, pretended housing was her top priority, setting a laughable target of 36,000 new homes per year (an 83% jump over the pathetic current trends which is interesting how that is identical to the sudden drop in state deficit of found money)—then she completely bailed and didn't follow through.
And let's not forget how she slimed her way into that position; it's suspicious as hell.
House Bill 2138 pretends to streamline permits and expand “middle housing” like duplexes, triplexes, and townhomes. But that means jack shit in a state that's historically failed to act like it's even part of the fucking Union.
Recent legislation: A dozen or so bills passed to "protect" renter deposits, expand shelter access, and boost housing production. But that's all worthless window dressing when the insane local and state regulations, plus those bloodsucking taxes, keep sucking money straight into politicians' and their cronies' pockets and pensions—proving once again how ineffective and corrupt this whole system is!
Where the Real Disconnect (And Endless Lies) Hides
Developers always feast first: Rezoning and tax scams artificially inflate property values, pricing out locals—the exact crap you're bitching about, but then you morons cave and support it every goddamn time like brainless sheep.
Corporate takeover: Mega-corporations and greedy developers hijack the entire conversation, while small businesses and local communities get fucked over with scraps. Just look at the Amazon centers screwing our power grids and poisoning our fresh water supplies—what a cluster fuck!
Band-aid bullshit fixes: Doling out tents and cutting refund checks at year's end for state taxes? That's not solving homelessness; it's admitting total failure, you idiots! Where the hell are these people supposed to go? The fucking moon?
It's surrender to a cabal of assholes controlling everything, especially finance, concentrated in Portland while starving the rest of the state. And those same scumbag politicians have been shoving anyone not in their family out of Salem and onto the streets for years—it's not new, it's deliberate!
Community identity in ruins: Oregon has zero unified cultural backbone because these politicians exploit divisions on purpose, and they've been doing it for decades. Hell, many of these resisting assholes aren't even from our damn state to begin with.
Who Actually Admits This Shit (But Does Nothing)
Pam Marsh (D–Ashland) flat-out said the state is “woefully short on housing.” But I call bullshit—look at all the vacant properties, abandoned houses, and units sitting empty, plus the moronic restrictions on renting out rooms.
Governor Kotek calls the crisis “one of the largest emergencies Oregon has ever faced.”
But once she conned her way into office with her "clean it up" horseshit, she's vanished from the scene, blocking communities from fixing their own problems in true Marxist-style authoritarian bullshit. But acknowledgment isn’t accountability, and you are the fools dancing to the same tune and crying when nothing improves.
They admit the problem, but solutions are glacial, bureaucratic crap often hijacked by developer scum—if they even happen at all. It's all a slimy marketing scam to snag office, fat paychecks, and payoffs. These people are all fucking criminals.
The Rotten Core of This Mess
Votes are meaningless because they truly are—those entrenched assholes in control, who should've been booted decades ago, have their families' slimy interests (developers, banks, state agencies) overriding everyone else's needs if you're not in their exclusive little club.
Housing policy is reactive, restrictive garbage—not structural reform: Instead of torching the corrupt systems that blew up the bubble, they slap on patches with bubblegum, spit, and dirt while the same greedy players rake in profits and the rest of us suffer like idiots.
Education and small business support? More like indoctrination and promoted laziness. Crucial for a strong community, but they're deliberately sidelined for globalist corporate pipelines that fuck us all over.
Bottom line:
Oregon’s so-called leadership admits the housing crisis exists, but they won't dismantle the corrupt structures because they are the corrupt structures. They're shielding the same bastards who inflated values, rezoned neighborhoods into oblivion, and gutted jobs. That's why you see tents instead of homes, empty slogans instead of real culture, and division instead of community.
And the fucking punchline? You're all too goddamn stupid to unite and fight back—instead, you scrap over crumbs like a pack of rabid, starving dogs! So stop barking and actually unite together and fight them because they are not your problem alone. They are everyone's problem collectively!
A divided people is a conquered people.
