The Structural Failure of Modern Journalism
Narrative‑Driven Reporting Fuels Hostility and Public Distrust
I try to stay consistent and remove as many fallacies as possible. That’s exactly why the structural problems in modern journalism stand out so clearly.
Modern political journalism has drifted far from its foundational purpose of informing the public with clarity, evidence, and balance. Instead, many major outlets—across the ideological spectrum—have embraced a narrative‑driven model that prioritizes emotional impact over analytical rigor. This shift has produced a predictable pattern of fallacies, selective framing, and rhetorical shortcuts that distort public understanding and intensify social division.
A recent example illustrates the problem clearly. The article in question relies heavily on emotional framing, one‑sided sourcing, and speculative connections that are presented as meaningful trends. These techniques are not unique to one publication; they reflect a broader structural issue in mainstream media.
Emotional Framing Over Evidence
