WINO (Witch/Warlock Only In Name): Witchcraft For Beginners
What's a WINO? Witch/Warlock Only In Name!
Witchcraft For Beginners is a case study in pure hypocrisy with selective rule enforcement and provides the:
Anatomy of a Digital Witch Hunt by such WINOs: A Study in Modern Hypocrisy and Cosplayer Clowns.
The following is a total demolition of the post by StunningChipmunk7230 and the parasites that followed her lead demonstrate clearly A Study in Modern Hypocrisy and Cosplayer Clowns pretending to be one thing and pushing the hate they claim to condemn.
Typical.
StunningChipmunk7230 (From Facebook.com)
"So....I've infiltrated a Witches for Maga group. Not only are they delusional but also very hateful. They are currently butthurt because we don't allow them in our group. It cracks me up."
Consider this:
What kind of wanna be "Secret Agent Man" bullshit is that?
This isn't a "spiritual circle." It is a quivering pile of hate from people who suck at relationships, suck at life, and think Charmed was a documentary. Here is the full scope of their delusional echo chambers and feminazi Starhawk-style “Burning Times” myth-makers who have as much power as "a burned out light bulb" and no batteries.
1. The Cowardice of the "Spy"
The Reality: StunningChipmunk7230 brags about "infiltrating" a Facebook group as if she’s a double agent. In reality, she’s a bored voyeur clicking "Join" to snoop on women who actually have the spine to stand for something.
The Hypocrisy: She calls them "hateful" while she is the one actively stalking them. She claims they are "butthurt" about being excluded, yet she is the one obsessively checking their page to feed her own ego. It is the height of immaturity—a middle-school "mean girl" tactic from someone who has clearly never held a real job or faced a real struggle.
2. The "Burning Times" Myth & Historical Illiteracy
The Quotes: * Brenda Sproul: "So they support the people who would burn them at the stake. Idiotic."
Shawn Donnelly: "Is their 2nd group called witches that support burning witches alive?"
Tabatha Swart: "They'll be the first ones burned at the stake."
Andreya Duffy: "I'm quite sure the ladies and gents at Salem... died anyway."
Julie Ann: "They are the women that would have outed witches to be burnt."
The Confrontation: This is a Stolen Concept. The "Burning Times" is a debunked 1970s feminist myth created by people who wanted to feel special without doing the work.
The Truth Pill: Historical witch trials were secular panics where Christians accused other Christians. There was no "pagan genocide." By claiming this "heritage," they are lying to themselves to justify hating conservative women.
The Irony: If Salem happened today, these Facebook commenters would be the ones pointing the finger. They are the ones demanding ideological purity, "spying" on neighbors, and calling for the social "burning" of anyone who doesn't repeat their "libtard" mantras.
3. The "Inclusivity" Lie & Gatekeeping
The Quotes: * Janice O: "I don’t understand how anyone who has positions of hatred... even has an interest in witchcraft."
StunningChipmunk7230: "We don't allow them in our group."
Brittany Henderson: "They get all butt hurt when we don't allow them in the local group I run either."
Laura Lech: "I CHOOSE not to share with maga... because I find them disgusting."
The Confrontation: They claim their culture is "inclusive" while being the most exclusive, bigoted people on the internet.
The Hypocrisy: They define "hatred" as "anyone who disagrees with me." They brag about banning women who support their husbands, brothers, and country. They have turned a spiritual practice into a political echo chamber. If your "spirituality" requires a "safe room" to protect you from a conservative woman's opinion, you aren't a "strong witch"—you're a fragile "fluffy bunny" who can't handle the real world. Also, if you exclude men, you are a sexist and toxic feminist misandrist fascist.
4. Dehumanization and Sociopathic Malice
The Quotes: * Lucy Fumiko: "Glad we are hurting them haha fuck off maggots."
Steph Spearsong: "Any way we can all get together and come up with a spell to ruin their lives?"
Patricia Lee: "Stock up on s'mores ingredients so when the maga crowd burns them we can enjoy it more."
Brittany Seren: "I snooped. Maggots are so moronic."
The Confrontation: This is the sociopathic core of the "Love and Light" movement.
The Reality: They use terms like "maggots" to strip people of their humanity.
The Hypocrisy: They claim to follow the "Wiccan Rede" ("Harm none"), yet they are openly calling for the destruction of lives and laughing at the idea of women being burned alive. They have become the "perpetual paranoid victim" who uses their supposed "spirituality" as a weapon to bully others because they are too weak-willed to pull away from their "penis-fearing unholy vagina garbage."
5. The Feminine Paradox & Misandry
The Quotes: * Carolyn Ceruti: "As a woman who wants an equal voice... MAGA openly hates me."
Angela Bohac: "Hideous hags for maga... there I fixed it."
Ko Rie (The Rebuttal): "Claiming men can be women is very misogynistic... supporting a regime [Palestine] that sees women as a third of a man... just trying to figure out the gymnastics."
The Confrontation: They think "feminine power" is about hating men and "sewing up their twats."
The Reality: A woman who respects her husband, honors her father, and loves her country displays an autonomous strength that these women cannot fathom.
The Hypocrisy: They attack MAGA as "anti-woman" while supporting ideologies that erase biological womanhood and foreign regimes that would actually stone them to death for their "witchy" dress-up. They hate the "MAGA witch" because she doesn't need their collective validation—she has a foundation, while they only have a "vibe" and a load of mental illnesses. Also they admit With is only a female title which means Warlock is a masculine one and deserves equal redemption and billing or they are the sexists they claim to condemn.
6. The Pedophilia Projection
The Quotes: * Virginia Kobylarz: "How many mental gymnastics to change from throwing a pedophile in jail... to consent at age 7..."
Kimberly Ann: "Witches for Pedophelia... that's what their cult stands for."
Corrie Villarreal: "Imagine protecting Pedophiles..."
The Confrontation: This is Psychological Projection at its most dangerous.
The Reality: They label conservative families—the people most vocal about protecting children from radical curricula and medicalization—as "pro-pedophile."
The Hypocrisy: This is a cowardly tactic used to avoid arguing against actual conservative policies. By using the most heinous label possible, they excuse themselves from acting like rational adults. They are the "blind drones" in their own hypocrisy.
7. The "Energy" and "Empath" Cop-out
The Quotes: * Robert Lackstein: "Keep all dark energy out of our group circle including MAGA."
Tracey Thomas: "As an empath, I want to give them no access to my emotions."
The Confrontation: "Dark energy" is just coded language for "I can't beat your argument."
The Reality: These people aren't empaths; they're narcissists. A real empath would understand the concerns of a mother who wants a secure border or a wife who wants a stable economy for her family. They use spiritual jargon to protect their delusion and hide from the "Truth Pill" that there are only Two Genders, three orientations, and a whole lot of people needing a reality check.
If that's not bad enough, their rules on that Witchcraft for Beginners are also proof of a broken and unstable mind where all the rules are self contradictory, and ridiculous.
The rules themselves already read like something thrown together by an unstable mind that never seriously checked them for consistency or basic logic. They sound “nice” on the surface, but the moment you put them side by side, they collapse into nonsense. Here’s the breakdown and the rebuttal you asked for.
1. “No discrimination of any kind” vs “NO MAGA CULT ALLOWED”
Their rules:
“No bullying, sexual harassment, grammar police or discrimination of any kind (- the below rules).”
“!!!! NO MAGA CULT ALLOWED !!!!”
Contradiction:
You cannot claim “no discrimination of any kind” and then openly discriminate against one political/ideological group by label.
They didn’t say “no political posts”; they said “no MAGA people,” period. That is discrimination on the basis of belief and association.
Rebuttal:
This isn’t a principle; it’s a tantrum in rule form. They wrapped their personal hatred of one political camp in the phrase “no discrimination,” then carved out a giant exception because their emotions couldn’t handle consistency. A stable mind starts with a principle and applies it universally. They started with their bias and faked a principle around it.
2. “All ethnicities & backgrounds are welcomed” vs selective exclusion
Their rules:
“This group is global with people of all sorts from all over the world. All ethnicities & backgrounds are welcomed.”
Followed by, “NO MAGA CULT ALLOWED !!!!”
Contradiction:
“All backgrounds” cannot be true if you are banning one entire background by political orientation.
They are literally saying: “Everyone is welcome… except these people we hate.”
Rebuttal:
They brag about welcoming “all backgrounds” and then slam the door on a giant chunk of people based strictly on politics. That’s not inclusivity, it’s curated ideological purity.
A sane, self-aware person would at least admit, “We’re not for everyone.”
You can’t even manage that honesty; you want the moral high ground and your blacklist at the same time.
3. “No bashing other beliefs” vs their own belief-bashing
Their rules:
“No posts bashing other beliefs. Focus on teaching about our paths.”
But also: “NO MAGA CULT ALLOWED !!!!” and demonizing certain practices (“No Illuminati! No Egg Cleansing/Readings!” etc.)
Contradiction:
They forbid members from “bashing beliefs” while the rules themselves bash and demonize a defined belief group as a “cult.”
“No posts bashing beliefs” really means “You may not bash beliefs we like. We will freely bash those we don’t.”
Rebuttal:
You claim to protect beliefs from being bashed while your own rules literally bash a belief group by calling them a “cult” and exiling them. Either you can’t see your own reflection, or you don’t care. A mind that’s actually stable realizes, “If I say ‘no bashing beliefs,’ that includes the beliefs I hate.” You clearly never thought that far.
4. “Be kind. No bullying.” vs their contempt for dissenters
Their rules:
“Be patient. Be kind. No bullying… Do not start any drama.”
Then: “The whining ‘Im leaving’ posts don’t need to be made, you should know how to exit on your own without attention seeking.”
“Do not tell us/me how to manage this one. I created this group & I’m the only admin.”
Contradiction:
Members are ordered to be endlessly kind and non-confrontational.
The admin, on the other hand, openly mocks people as “whining” and “attention seeking” and shuts down any critique of how the group is run.
Rebuttal:
You demand that everyone else be soft, gentle, and drama-free while you reserve the right to sneer, belittle, and shut people down. That’s not a community rule set; it’s a control mechanism built for your ego. Stable people don’t need to hide their need for total control behind “be kind” slogans.
5. “Safe space” vs one-person dictatorship
Their rules:
“This needs to be a safe space for those who lost those everywhere else.”
“I created this group & I’m the only admin.”
“Admin reserves the right to deny or revoke memberships at their own discretion!!!!”
Contradiction:
Real safety comes from clear, consistent standards and accountable moderation, not from one person’s unchecked “discretion.”
They’re openly saying: “You’re safe here, as long as I like you and agree with you. If I don’t, you’re gone.”
Rebuttal:
You can’t build a real “safe space” on the foundation of one unstable gatekeeper who answers only to their own mood and ideology. That’s not safe, it’s arbitrary. You wrote “safe space” to make yourself feel virtuous; you backed it with “I can delete anyone I want whenever I want.” That’s the opposite of stable.
6. “No drama” vs rules designed for permanent drama
Their rules:
“Do not start any drama.”
“Do not like or agree with a post, then scroll by.”
Also: “NO MAGA CULT ALLOWED !!!!”
“No posts bashing other beliefs.”
Contradiction:
Banning a whole political identity, bashing them as a “cult,” and elevating one person’s absolute authority is a recipe for drama, not peace.
These rules attract conflict by design: ideological purity tests, vague “discretion,” and heresy zones.
Rebuttal:
You claim to hate drama, yet you wrote rules that guarantee it: ideological bans, vague “discretion,” and your ego on a throne. A mind that’s calm and rational writes rules to reduce friction; you clearly wrote yours to punish the people and ideas that trigger you.
7. “Teach professionally” vs emotional, inconsistent framework
Their rules:
“Teach professionally.”
“This is not a comedy club, give honest answers and do not mislead others.”
Yet:
The rules themselves are emotional, self-contradictory, and sloppily structured.
“Professionally” would mean clear categories: content rules, behavior rules, enforcement rules. Instead, they’re a venting session poorly disguised as policy.
Rebuttal:
They tell others to “teach professionally” while your own foundational document reads like a late-night rant. And I know rants. I make them myself often, but at least take a moment and run them against logic first. A professional, stable mind checks for consistency, tone, and clarity. They just stapled their biases together and called it “rules” which look more like an a sex tape that went terribly wrong.
These rules aren’t the product of a stable, principled mind. They’re the product of someone trying to soothe their own anxieties by writing themselves absolute power under the banner of “safety,” “kindness,” and “no discrimination,” then making loud exceptions whenever their emotions get triggered. That isn’t thoughtful policy; it’s emotional damage scribbled over buzz words and empty talking points.
The Final Truth Pill:
These people are WINOs (Witches In Name Only), pronounced Wine-Ohs. They have no connection to the ancient, bloody, and powerful history of the craft—which was about survival, reality, and the raw forces of nature. They are a secular political group using the aesthetics of the occult to bully women who still have their minds free from the "femi-nazi" brainwashing.
They are parasites. They are weak-willed. And they are too stupid to see that the men they hate are the ones who built the very world that keeps them safe enough to play "witchy dress-up" in their safe rooms.
Suck on that.
