Humanity’s Place in Creation

 

Human beings, like all other living entities, are not the central focus of creation. The One and Three, existing beyond the physical realm, are not bound by human interpretations of purpose, motivations, or desires. Any attempt to claim special insight into their intentions—whether to assert authority, justify superiority, or shape doctrine—lacks truth or certainty and is often a means of self-elevation rather than genuine understanding.

 

Patterns in History

 

Throughout history, both ancient and modern, people have repeatedly sought to assert control over belief—sometimes through distortions, assumptions, or forceful claims of divine favor. This occurs regardless of whether individuals embrace the One and Three or reject all notions of the divine. Unfortunately, humanity has more often lived up to its worst potential rather than its best, allowing division, conflict, and self-interest to dictate actions. Yet, despite these failings, rare individuals and moments of goodness emerge, proving that humanity still possesses the capacity for wisdom, growth, and transformation.

 

More Widespread than Appreciated

​

​The theme of a single god associated with three wives or goddesses is deeply ingrained in the fabric of human belief systems, yet it has often been suppressed or overlooked. While some cultures have preserved this concept to varying degrees, the most prominent example remains in India, where it continues to play a vital role in the overall cultural and religious framework.

​

Cymatics and Sacred Geometry

​

The "strings" that generate the patterned language of Geometric Symbolism find parallel expression in the study of Cymatics—often referred to as the Divine Songs and Music of the Spheres. These are the sound waves of the One and Three, bridging the invisible with the visible, the audible with the inaudible, through vibrational resonance. 

​

Cymatics reveals how specific frequencies produce dynamic yet ordered patterns—shapes that resonate with sacred geometry, symmetry, and universal beauty. These forms do not arise randomly, but through the interaction of vibration and medium, giving structure to energy in motion.

​

By examining how sound manifests as visible pattern, we enter a contemplative space—where geometry, form, and resonance become gateways to deeper questions about the fabric of reality, the nature of vibration, and the unseen harmonics that govern both the material and immaterial world. Thus, sound (word) itself becomes fundamental to all l existence, including our own and its continuation or extinction.

​

Considerations: There are several other characters lines up with three consorts within the Icelandic source stories, though as one who actually has read through, researched and compared the content of such things like the various Eddas, there is no actual uniformity as is often falsely portrayed, and has a lot of clear barrowings by 13th and14th century authors from Greek and Roman Latin source materials instead. ​

​

Throughout history, triadic forms have fascinated cultures as symbols of balance, unity, and cosmic order. While many interpretations acknowledge their presence across spiritual and philosophical systems, few directly connect them to observable patterns in nature. Instead, references tend to rely on assumptions, fragmented citations, or abstract footnotes, failing to clearly define the role of Sacred Geometry in shaping these ideas.

 

When nature-based evidence is provided, it is often misaligned with unrelated concepts or overshadowed by theories detached from true geometric foundations. Many sources struggle to fully recognize or accept the deeper mathematical and structural parallels that Sacred Geometry reveals. Druwayu, however, firmly establishes these connections, ensuring a coherent and structured approach to understanding geometry as a reflection of universal truths rather than speculative symbolism.

 

Sacred Geometry as the Divine Blueprint

 

The formation of Sacred Geometry is not merely symbolic—it is the mathematical and structural foundation upon which creation unfolds. The One and Three express themselves through:

 

Sacred Geometry serves as the mathematical and symbolic foundation through which the Drikeyu—the Three Keys of Druwayu—are encoded into creation. These principles are not arbitrary constructs, but emerge directly from the structure of reality, guiding the laws, dynamics, and life force in all things.

 

Creation as a Reflection, not a Container

 

The laws of nature, physics, and existence do not define the One and Three—they are expressions of their will. They exist outside the confines of the physical and metaphysical, yet their presence can be perceived through creation:

 

1. Mathematical Precision – The divine blueprint ensures that universal patterns, from fractals to celestial orbits, retain harmony and consistency. This expresses and is an expression of the Worloga.

2. Energies & Forces – The laws governing motion, time, space, and causality are a direct encoding of their presence. This expresses and is an expression of the Wyrda and the Wihas.

3. Life’s Dynamic Evolution – Every living system operates within their predefined principles, ensuring continual growth and interconnectedness. This is an expression of all three keys in as the directive principles, shaping forces and external essence that comes from the One, is channeled through the Three, and realized as all existence, known and unknown.

 

Thus, Sacred Geometry is the signature of the One and Three, woven into the fabric of creation—not as a limitation, but as an unfolding expression of their divine essence. The Drikeyu manifests within the very fabric of reality through Sacred Geometry, ensuring that existence is structured, dynamic, and living. Through this geometric encoding, the One and Three shape creation, not as passive figures within the universe, but as its defining force, ensuring that laws, transformation, and life energy follow an eternal, harmonious order. ​The basis of all this comes from the conceptual key arguments and examples where geometry has been used to suggest the existence of a divine order, without claiming these as definitive proofs—since that’s a matter of belief—but as historical and conceptual perspectives. Be aware that when God is stated in this, it also includes the three Goddesses within Druwayu.

​​

How the Universe Cannot Be Its Own Cause:

​

While this same geometry is present throughout all existence, right down to the organizations of atoms and cosmic particles resulting also in molecules of substances and molecular biology, the following also clarifies why the recognition of the One and Three is also based in logic rather than mere imagination. 

 

The universe being its own uncaused cause fails due to two primary reasons:

​

• Chance or Design: Either the universe self-organized by blind chance and luck, or it was created by an intelligent, conscious, and precise being (or beings).​

• Evidence Against Self-Causation: Scientific and physical laws provide observable evidence that the universe could not have arisen spontaneously:

 

Second Law of Thermodynamics:

​

• This law states that heat flows naturally from hot to cold, meaning the universe is gradually cooling down. An eternal universe would have depleted all usable energy already, which is not the case.

 

Cosmic Expansion:

​

• The universe’s space-time is expanding faster than the speed of light, especially where there is less matter as opposed to where masses of matter take on more concentrated density, originating from a singular point of "infinite density" (a void singularity). This demonstrates a beginning rather than eternal self-existence, but also that the "age of the universe" is an erroneous relative point of observance.

 

Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation:

​

• The distribution and "afterglow" of heat from the universe's initial expansion support the theory of an explosive origin event, aligning with the Big Bang meaning the universe does in fact have a central core.

• Gravitational Waves and Galactic Seeds: The early universe displayed fine variations that enabled the formation of galaxies and life-sustaining elements, which point to an intentional origin rather than random chaos.

​

Finite within the Infinite

​

Co-Relativity of Space, Time, and Matter Scientific discoveries confirm that space, time, and matter are interconnected and had a simultaneous beginning. For many reasons, these findings prove that the universe, as we know it, is finite and had an origin.​ However, one must also recognize a loop effect based on the concept of velocity. For example if one were to reach the velocity of the maximum estimated speed of light, time would begin reaching a zero point (come to a stop) and instantaneously start looping back in reverse. The universe shows space itself is expanding faster than light and with it time itself, meaning that as it is expanding it is also simultaneously contracting.

 

It still would require an initial starting point of first creation to allow this looping effect to occur, and where space and time are accelerated, it also means the processes of creation proceed more rapidly, especially as things are closer together allowing for space time to have moments of rapid expansion, slowed down contraction and instantiated expansion (in other words, everything moves faster for a time, mid way slows down, then speeds up again past the midway point creating the inversion and restarted expansion processes).  

​

Logical and Rational Conclusion Given the above evidence; the universe cannot be its own uncaused cause. Using logic, reason, and eliminating flawed assumptions:

​

• There must exist something beyond the universe.

• This "something" must, by definition, be timeless, spaceless, immaterial, and self-existent—an uncaused cause.

​​

​Nature of Timeless Creator(s)

 

If such a being is timeless, it logically follows that this entity has no beginning, as timelessness (eternity) is the very absence of temporal limitations.

 

• This aligns with the concept of God as possessing Aseity—the quality of being self-derived and independent.

• This is expressed through the initiating state of True Sacred Geometry.

​

God, therefore, is:

​

• The first uncaused cause.

• The ultimate source of all other causes.

• The creator of all things.

​

Misconceptions and Counterarguments

​

• Claim: The uncaused cause does not necessarily have to be God.

  • Response: This claim often loops back into the infinite regress fallacy or relies on speculative ideas (e.g., "mindless dimensions" or "multiverses"). Such arguments lack observational evidence and remain untestable theories.

• Claim: Multiverses or other dimensions explain the universe’s existence without a creator.

  • Response: The existence of multiverses, if proven, would not negate God’s existence. Instead, it would increase the probability of God being the ultimate source, as a non-dimensional, immaterial state becomes more plausible.

​

Cosmic Intelligence giving Order: Intelligence and Order in the Universe The universe’s structure provides compelling evidence of intelligence behind its origin:

​

• Comprehensibility: The universe is understandable, suggesting purposeful organization rather than random chance.

• Cosmological Constants: The precise values of physical constants necessary for life far exceed probabilities of random occurrence.

• Laws of Nature: Universal laws remain unchanged over time, indicating they either predate the universe or were established at its inception by an intelligent source.

• Implied Mind and Awareness: The observable complexity and order suggest a mindful, intelligent creator distinct from but present in all things.

​

Rejection based on Appeals to Emotion: Emotional Rebuttals and Distraction Questions Disbelief often stems from emotional arguments or faith-based positions lacking substantive evidence.

 

For example:

​

• Asking why theology exists or why people worship the One and the Three is a distraction.

• Such questions pertain to opinions and justifications, not the existence of the universe or its creator.

 

Conclusion: The evidence overwhelmingly supports the idea that the universe is not its own cause. By recognizing the necessity of an uncaused cause—something timeless, spaceless, and immaterial—we arrive at the logical concept of the One and Three ultimate origins of all things.

​

Five Scientific Reasons the Universe Cannot Be Its Own Origin

 

1. The Universe seems to be Running Down

 

The Second Law of Thermodynamics states that heat always flows spontaneously from hotter to colder regions. Since the universe is expanding and cooling, this indicates that it had a prior source of heat and energy. If the universe were eternal, all energy would have been exhausted long ago—yet usable energy still remains, implying a starting point.

 

2. Expansion from a Singular Point

 

Space-time is expanding faster than light, confirming that everything originated from a singularity—a point of infinite density described as a void singularity of nothingness. This means the universe had a beginning, contradicting claims of self-existence without cause.

 

3. Microwave Background Radiation Confirms an Origin

 

The cosmic microwave background radiation proves that the universe emerged from a specific initial state and has been cooling ever since. This aligns with the Second Law of Thermodynamics and provides evidence of an organized beginning, rather than random self-causation.

 

4. Galactic Formation and Laws of Physics

 

Early gravitational spirals and temperature variations allowed for galaxies, stars, and planets to form in structured patterns. The existence of consistent physical laws—which do not change over time—proves that the universe was set into motion by something beyond itself.

 

5. Space, Time, and Matter Had a Defined Beginning

 

Scientific observations confirm that space, time, and matter are co-relative, meaning they came into existence together. This supports the conclusion that the universe had a starting point, rather than existing eternally in a self-caused state.

​

Additional Scientific Reinforcements

 

• The Universe Is Not Self-Perpetuating – The expansion and cooling rate of the universe prove that it had a definite beginning. If it were truly eternal and self-existent, it would have always been in a state of equilibrium, contradicting observable thermodynamic principles.

• Entropy and Disorder Increase Over Time – If the universe were self-caused, then its structure and order would need to reverse entropy and self-organize, which defies both thermodynamics and causality principles. Blind chance cannot create complex, ordered structures.

• Consciousness and Logic Cannot Emerge From Non-Intelligence – Physical laws govern the universe, yet laws do not spontaneously arise without a lawgiver. Matter alone does not self-generate intelligence; intent, structure, and order are necessary components of rational existence.

• Mathematical Precision in Cosmology – Every cosmological constant is mathematically fine-tuned, allowing for functional physics to operate. The precision necessary for the formation of stars, planets, and life is too extreme to be the product of randomness, further supporting intentional organization.

​​​

Philosophical Expansions: The Rational Necessity of an Uncaused Cause

 

Beyond the scientific evidence, logic dictates that:

 

• Self-Creation Is Impossible – An entity cannot create itself, as this would require pre-existing before existence, violating all foundational laws of reason and logic. If it can then it would be completely unique unto itself. In both cases a God of some kind becomes becomes a reasonable and logical conclusion. 

• A Necessary First Cause Must Exist – Since all known physical realities operate under causality, the universe must have originated from a source beyond itself, which possesses a fundamental, self-existing nature. This reinforces the conceptualization of a God of some kind.

• Mind Cannot Emerge from Mindlessness – If the universe were self-caused, intelligence and consciousness would have to arise from non-intelligence, which contradicts every observed process of cognitive and rational development. If mind can emerge from Mindlessness, than it does not discount a higher intelligence as the ultimate uncaused cause of all things and therefore once again, a God of some kind.  

• Abstract Concepts Point to an Intelligent Source – Mathematics, logic, and order exist beyond physical matter and point to a foundational source beyond the natural universe—one that possesses intelligence beyond human comprehension. Because the rational and irrational are equal reality of existence and perception than rationally and irrationally there is a God of some kind.

​

This leads to the logical conclusion that a transcendent cause—a timeless, spaceless, immaterial intelligence—must exist beyond the universe. This entity:

 

✔ Is not bound by time (eternal)

✔ Is not part of space or matter (immaterial)

✔ Is a first, uncaused cause  

✔ Possesses intelligence, intent, and design

​

A common counterargument is that nothing demands that the uncaused first cause must be the One and Three. Loosely this is true. However, when considering how geometry is derived from observations of nature and not an invention to "explain nature" this falls apart on its own. Let's consider some other simple factors:

​

• Some claim that mindless other dimensions or multiverses could have created the universe without intelligence.

• However, this argument falls into the infinite regress fallacy, shifting the burden without ever answering the fundamental question.

• Additionally, invoking alternate dimensions or universes increases the probability of the One and Three's existence rather than reducing it, as it implies higher levels of complexity and design beyond the observable universe.

 

To further address 'there is no reason to assume,' this can also be refuted if we also recognize:

​

✔ If the first cause is timeless, immaterial, and self-existing, it must be uniquely distinct—aligning with every classical theological description of the One and Three.

✔ If the first cause is God Only, this does not exclude the Three Goddesses as counterparts and mutual companions in the creative processes 

✔ If the first cause possessed intelligence, then it is not a mere physical force but an intentional entity and what would follow from that same entity is additional intelligences.

✔ If the laws of the universe were instantaneously structured at its origin, then a designing intelligence must be behind them.

​

Ultimately, the reasoned conclusion is that the universe(s):

​

✔ Had a beginning.

✔ Did not cause itself (themselves).   

✔ Operates under structured, intentional, directive laws.

✔ Reflects intelligence that cannot arise randomly.

✔ Requires a cause beyond itself that is intelligent, eternal, and absolute.

✔ And this necessary first cause fits only one description—the One and Three possessing Aseity.

​​​

Critics from anti-religious materialists ignoring physicists. ​

​

Critics (e.g., materialists) might counter that these patterns emerge from natural laws without needing a deity, but proponents (like Kepler or Newton, who saw God in mathematics) argue the laws themselves suggest a lawgiver, as do many physicists. In addition, a purely materialistic view of existence has long since been demonstrated to be incompatible. Below are examples where modern physics contradict the purely materialistic worldview and where they show where the paradigm stumbles, especially when the core foundations are bridged theologically, philosophically and mathematically within various sciences.

​

1. Quantum Indeterminacy and the Observer Effect

​

• Phenomenon: In quantum mechanics, particles exist in a superposition of states (e.g., both a wave and a particle) until measured. The act of observation collapses this superposition into a definite state (e.g., Schrödinger’s wave function collapse).

• Example: The double-slit experiment: When electrons pass through slits unobserved, they create an interference pattern (wave-like behavior). When observed, they act as particles, forming two bands. This shift depends on measurement, not just physical interaction.

• Challenge to Materialism: A strict materialist view assumes reality is fully objective and independent of observation. Yet, here, the observer’s role—whether human consciousness or a detector—seems to influence physical outcomes. This doesn’t align with a universe of purely deterministic matter; it suggests reality might be participatory or relational, hinting at something beyond mere physicality. Physicists like John Wheeler proposed the “participatory universe,” where observation co-creates reality, clashing with materialism’s passive, external stance.

 

2. Non-locality and Entanglement

​

• Phenomenon: Quantum entanglement shows that two particles, once linked, can instantaneously affect each other’s states, regardless of distance—faster than light, defying classical causality (Bell’s Theorem, experimentally confirmed by Aspect’s 1982 tests).

• Example: If two entangled electrons are separated by light-years and one’s spin is measured (say, “up”), the other’s spin instantly becomes “down,” with no apparent signal traveling between them, and theoretically, this remains constant regardless of distance, perhaps even to the other side of the known, yet unobservable, universe.

• Challenge to Materialism: Materialism relies on locality—interactions mediated by physical forces over space and time. Entanglement suggests a deeper, non-physical connection, often described as “spooky” (Einstein’s term). This doesn’t fit a universe of isolated material objects; it implies a holistic or interconnected reality, which some interpret as pointing to a unifying principle beyond matter (e.g., David Bohm’s “implicate order”).

 

3. The Fine-Tuning of the Universe

​

• Phenomenon: Cosmology reveals that physical constants (e.g., gravitational constant, electromagnetic force) are precisely calibrated to allow life. Tiny deviations would make stars, planets, or chemistry impossible.

• Example: The cosmological constant (governing universe expansion) is fine-tuned to 1 part in 10^120. If slightly larger, the universe would’ve expanded too fast for galaxies; if smaller, it’d collapse.

• Challenge to Materialism: Materialism often assumes the universe’s properties are random or inevitable outcomes of physical laws. Fine-tuning suggests either extraordinary coincidence (hard to swallow statistically) or intentional design, which materialism rejects. Alternatives like the multiverse (infinite universes with varying constants) remain untestable, leaving the question open—why this universe? Physicists like Paul Davies note this strains materialist explanations, hinting at purpose or a non-material origin.

​

​6 Primary Cosmological Constants

 

Many will not even recognize such things that are right before their very eyes, and some will literally talk themselves into willful ignorance about such matters, especially when the things of the scientific also align with the things of the spiritual, theological, and philosophical. ​As a case in point, this has 6 Primary Cosmological Constants. While there are indeed even more, these are the main ones that are better known to show clearly that the purely materialistic view of existence as being something occurring by pure chance or dumb luck is nonsensical. There are any more cosmological constants, of course, however, these are the main ones.

 

They are represented here within this geometric design by the specific symbols of associations often described as being the Fine-Tuning observable within the expressions and measurements of the mathematical expressions of natural laws that are eternally expressed everywhere. It's known to be real and simply cannot be accounted for by dumb luck or mere chance. These are the 6 dimensionless physical constants broad agreement among physicists and cosmologists that the Universe is in several respects 'fine-tuned' for the allowance of the emergence of physical biological life and emergence of intelligences. These concepts present the same basic perspective of intelligent agency and causes within information theories as an essential foundational reality expressed through everything. 

​

1. N, the ratio of the electromagnetic force to the gravitational force between a pair of protons, is approximately 10 to the 36. If it were significantly smaller, only a small and short-lived universe could exist.

2. Epsilon (ε), a measure of the nuclear efficiency of fusion from hydrogen to helium, is 0.007: when four nucleons fuse into helium, 0.007 (0.7%) of their mass is converted to energy. The value of ε is in part determined by the strength of the strong nuclear force. If ε were 0.006, a proton could not bond to a neutron, and only hydrogen could exist, and complex chemistry would be impossible. If it were above 0.008, no hydrogen would exist, as all the hydrogen would have been fused shortly after Inflation (the Big Bag) commenced though it’s also possible substantial hydrogen remains as long as the strong force coupling constant increases by less than about 50%.

3. Omega (Ω), commonly known as the density parameter, is the relative importance of gravity and expansion energy in the universe. It is the ratio of the mass density of the universe to the "critical density" and is approximately 1. If gravity were too strong compared with dark energy and the initial cosmic expansion rate, the universe would have collapsed before life could have evolved. If gravity were too weak, no stars would have formed.

4. Lambda (Λ), describes the ratio of the density of so called ‘dark energy’ to the critical energy density of the universe, given certain reasonable assumptions such as that dark energy density is a constant. In terms of Planck units, and as a natural dimensionless value, Λ is on the order of 10 to the 122. This is so small that it has no significant effect on cosmic structures that are smaller than a billion light-years across. A slightly larger value of the cosmological constant would have caused space to expand rapidly enough that stars and other astronomical structures would not be able to form.

5. Q, the ratio of the gravitational energy required to pull a large galaxy apart to the energy equivalent of its mass, is around 10−5. If it is too small, no stars can form. If it is too large, no stars can survive because the universe is too violent.

6. D, the number of spatial dimensions in space-time, is 3; specifically, width, length and depth, often expressed as three planes along their own X, Y and Z axes vital to motion.

​Given the remarkably precise nature of these numerical qualities, many physicists argue that the likelihood of such exact measurements arising by chance, dumb luck or randomly alone is exceedingly low, to the point of being ridiculous to make such a claim, and does not hold up to proper and precise scrutiny.​​​