PURGE OCCULTISM

Exploring the Henotheistic Roots and Anthropomorphic Portrayals of the Deity of Israel in the Hebrew Bible

The Hebrew Bible, often referred to as the Old Testament in Christian traditions, presents a complex portrait of the deity known as the God of Israel. While later Jewish and Christian theology emphasizes strict monotheism—affirming one all-powerful, all-knowing God—earlier texts reflect influences from ancient Near Eastern polytheistic or henotheistic worldviews.

Henotheism acknowledges multiple divine beings but prioritizes one as supreme. Scholars argue that the Bible's depiction of Yahweh (the primary name for the deity of Israel) evolves from a local deity amid a council of gods to the sole creator of existence, by displacing and absorbing the associated stories and attributes of previously distinct entities by the later authors distorting and rewriting their texts drawn from many surrounding cultures.

This is evident in passages suggesting interactions with other divine entities, as well as anthropomorphic…

The five-pointed star is one of the oldest and most widespread human symbols, yet today it is often misunderstood, feared, or outright demonized. The terms pentagram and pentacle are frequently confused, so let’s start with the etymology.

A pentagram (from Greek pente, “five,” and gramma, “line or writing”) is simply a five-pointed star. Drawn in one continuous line, it is one of the most basic geometric forms the human mind produces. A pentacle, by contrast, comes from combining pente (“five”) with circle—that is, a star enclosed within a circle. In art, religion, and philosophy, this circle often signifies unity, wholeness, or the cycles of life.

Beyond Hollywood and “Occultist” Nonsense

Don’t be afraid of the pentagram just because some opportunistic occultists layered it with pseudo-Gnostic theatrics, or because Hollywood decided to milk fear by plastering it onto every horror movie. The upright star is not “holy” and the inverted star is not “satanic.” That…

“Ladies and gentlemen, tonight we’re going to examine one of the most enduring ideas of modern culture: the belief in space aliens. For over a century, the public has been bombarded with stories of UFOs, crashes, alien pilots, and government cover-ups. But when we peel back the layers of this phenomenon, a very different picture emerges—one not of extraterrestrial visitors, but of human invention, misinterpretation, and manipulation. Let’s begin.”

Part 1: The Mars Craze – Fiction as ‘Fact’

In 1877, during the opposition of Mars, Italian astronomer Giovanni Schiaparelli observed what he called canali—meaning ‘channels.’ This was mistranslated into English as ‘canals,’ a much more artificial-sounding term. American astronomer Percival Lowell took this mistranslation and ran with it. Despite the fact that the so-called canals changed over time—a dead giveaway of optical illusion—Lowell published book after book claiming Mars was home to a dying civilization. By 1908, his ideas had…

The word church is surrounded by centuries of tradition, theological interpretation, and linguistic confusion. Many popular claims about its origins are repeated without question, but when examined carefully, the history of the word is far more straightforward—and very different from what many have been led to believe.

The Real Roots: Circle and Ring

The English word church traces back through Old English cirice (also appearing as circe and cyrice) and its related forms in Old High German (kirihha) and Old Norse (kirkja) [Harper, Online Etymology Dictionary]. These variants ultimately reflect the influence of the Old French cercle, which itself comes from the Latin circulus—a diminutive of circus, meaning "ring" [Lewis & Short, A Latin Dictionary].

The Latin term in turn derives from the Ancient Greek word κίρκος (kírkos), meaning "circle" or "ring" [Liddell & Scott, A Greek–English Lexicon]. From there, the chain of development flows naturally:

• Greek: κίρκος (kírkos) → “circle”

The Malleus Maleficarum (1487 CE), written by Heinrich Kramer (Institoris) with some association to Jacob Sprenger, was not simply a “general” witch-hunting manual, but rather an extension of earlier inquisitorial traditions that had long been directed against specific heretical sects in the later Middle Ages. Much of what is popularly claimed about it today is the result of modern sensationalism and projection, especially feminist reinterpretations from the late 20th century, rather than an honest reading of the text in its historical context.

Later renderings of the title — Der Hexenhammer and The Witches’ Hammer — are themselves products of modern publicity and romanticized notions of witchcraft, promoted mainly from the early 1900s onward. The original Latin title deserves closer examination. Malleus means “mallet” or “hammer,” in the sense of a judge’s gavel. Male- derives from the Latin male, “ill” or “bad,” while -ficus comes from facere (“to make” or “to do”), with plural endings forming “ones.” Thus,…

Abstract

For over half a century, occultism has metastasized from countercultural curiosity into a pervasive parasite infecting politics, psychology, education, and public life. Cloaked in the language of “hidden wisdom,” movements ranging from astrology and Wicca to Scientology and “energy healing” have masqueraded as profound while peddling incoherence, exploitation, and fraud. This paper traces occultism’s expansion from the 1970s to the present, examining its corrosive influence across domains, its hypocrisy in so-called “secret societies,” and the devastating consequences of its normalization. Far from ancient or profound, the occult is a cultural malignancy that thrives on ignorance, trauma, and cowardice in confronting reality.

1. Introduction: The Lie of “Hidden Wisdom”

• Occultism presents itself as esoteric truth, accessible only to initiates. In reality, it is a recycling bin of plagiarized myths, pseudoscience, and authoritarian theater.

• The word “occult” (Latin occultus, meaning hidden) suggests concealed profundity; what it conceals, however, is vacuity.

The term “Satanic Stupidity” is not a theological insult—it’s a structural diagnosis. It refers to the performative, self-contradictory behaviors of individuals or institutions that invoke rebellion, inversion, or “darkness” as a brand, while simultaneously clinging to the same moral scaffolding they claim to reject. This stupidity is not about intelligence. It’s about functional failure.

Let’s stop pretending

These groups masquerading as spiritual collectives are not sanctuaries of diversity. They’re cosplay cults wrapped in occult aesthetics, parading around as if Philosophical and Theological Satanism are inclusive frameworks. They’re not Warlocks. They’re not Witches. They’re ideological performers using spiritual language to mask exclusion, hostility, and cowardice.

They claim to stand for “All Paths,” yet openly vilify Christianity. They tolerate every worldview except the one they’ve decided to scapegoat. That’s not inclusion. That’s targeted bias. It’s ideological gatekeeping dressed up in robes and runes.

These groups are not spiritual leaders. They are unhinged…

Modern Paganism and Heathenry are often marketed as spiritual systems rooted in pre-Christian European traditions. This claim is structurally false.

• Historically, no one identified themselves as "pagans."

• The term "pagan" was typically used as an insult—dismissive, derogatory, and imposed by outsiders.

• Ironically, many early Christians were labeled "pagans" by Roman authorities, further muddying the term’s historical application.

What Exists Today